Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 417
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
3rd General Report on GREVIO’s activities
3rd General Report on GREVIO s activities 2022 06 14 2022 06 14 cyclePhraseHere Publication date: 14/06/2022 3rd GENERAL REPORT ON GREVIO S ACTIVITIES GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence covering the GREVIO3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOChttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOC
A/HRC/47/13: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Myanmar
United Nations A/HRC/47/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/13https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4713-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-myanmar
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea, implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (ETS No. 156)
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ETS No. 156 156 Strasbourg 1995 01 31T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member COEETS No. 156https://rm.coe.int/168007cdab
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Andersen v. Denmark
Andersen v. Denmark CCPR/C/99/D/1868/2009 Communication number s : 1868/2009 Author: Fatima Andersen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 99 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Jan 2009 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1868/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1586/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA 56987/15 THREEFOLD LEGAL ADVISORS LLC RUS 10/2/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD005698715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186439
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF A.P. GAR ON AND NICOT v. FRANCE 79885/12 52471/13 52596/13 SCP GATINEAU FATTACCINI SCP THOUIN PALAT BOUCARD FOURNIER J. PIERRAT E. FRA 4/6/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD007988512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172913
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY 15379/16 LUTINA A. NOR 12/10/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life read in the light of Article 9 Art. 9 Freedom of thought conscience and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214433
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK 45439/18 JENSEN T. DNK 9/15/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 350 90 193 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD004543918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-204602
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22954/93 N/A GBR 9/2/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 11 No violation of P1 3 Local Government and Housing Act 1989 sections 1 5 2 2 2 3 Schedule to the Local Government Officers ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0902JUD002295493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58222