Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1650
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.P. v. Lithuania
A.P. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/130/D/3786/2020 Communication number s : 3786/2020 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Lithuania Submission date 16 Jan 2020 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3786/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3264/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
Abramovich v. Belarus
Abramovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2702/2015 Communication number s : 2702/2015 Author: Aleksandr Abramovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 23 May 2011 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2702/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3171/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems (ETS No. 189)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems ETS No. 189 189 Strasbourg 2003 01 28T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the States which COEETS No. 189https://rm.coe.int/168008160f
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Information on Foreign Law (ETS No. 097)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Information on Foreign Law ETS No. 097 097 Strasbourg 1978 03 15T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 62 and for accession by the non member States which have COEETS No. 097https://rm.coe.int/1680077973
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 099)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ETS No. 099 099 Strasbourg 1978 03 17T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 30 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 099https://rm.coe.int/1680077975
Additional Protocol to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities (ETS No. 159)
Additional Protocol to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities ETS No. 159 159 Strasbourg 1995 11 09T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the States signatory to the Outline Convention COEETS No. 159https://rm.coe.int/168007cdae
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea, implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (ETS No. 156)
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ETS No. 156 156 Strasbourg 1995 01 31T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member COEETS No. 156https://rm.coe.int/168007cdab
Agreement on the Transfer of Corpses (ETS No. 080)
Agreement on the Transfer of Corpses ETS No. 080 080 Strasbourg 1973 10 26T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Strasbourg 1975 11 11T00:00:00 3 Ratifications. The Agreement provides for the COEETS No. 080https://rm.coe.int/168007617d
Akhadov v. Kyrgyzstan
Akhadov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/101/D/1503/2006 Communication number s : 1503/2006 Author: Otabek Akhadov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 18 Oct 2006 Date of decision 25 Mar 2011 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1503/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1610/en-US
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011 Communication number s : 2052/2011 Author: Suyunbai Akmatov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 07 Apr 2011 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2031/en-US
Alekseev v. Russian Federation
Alekseev v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/109/D/1873/2009 Communication number s : 1873/2009 Author: Nikolai Alekseev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Russian Federation Submission date 25 Mar 2009 Date of decision 25 Oct 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1873/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1686/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
BUTKEVICIUS v. Lithuania
BUTKEVICIUS v. Lithuania LTU 26/06/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Unlawful detention lack of a judicial review and infringement of the presumption EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4189
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217