Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 598
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
ALBRECHTAS v. Lithuania
ALBRECHTAS v. Lithuania LTU 19/04/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure by the authorities to allow sufficient access to the investigation case file resulting in the applicant s inability to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4332
ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION “ROMUVA” v. Lithuania
ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION ROMUVA v. Lithuania LTU 08/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns the non recognition as religious association in 2019 of a non traditional pagan association and lack of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58447
ANZELIKA SIMAITIENE v. Lithuania
ANZELIKA SIMAITIENE v. Lithuania LTU 12/10/2020 00:00:00 04/11/2020 15:26:31 Case Description: This case concerns the non payment of salaries of a former judge during her suspension from duties from 2006 to 2011 due to criminal proceedings that eventually EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56215
Addendum To The Second Compliance Report Lithuania
Addendum To The Second Compliance Report Lithuania LTU 2021 03 25 2021 05 06 I. INTRODUCTION The Addendum to the Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Lithuania to implement the recommendations issued in the Fourth GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)2-Final-eng-Lithuania-Add2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2021)2-Final-eng-Lithuania-Add2ndRC-PUBLIC
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea, implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (ETS No. 156)
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ETS No. 156 156 Strasbourg 1995 01 31T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member COEETS No. 156https://rm.coe.int/168007cdab
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011 Communication number s : 2052/2011 Author: Suyunbai Akmatov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 07 Apr 2011 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2031/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia
Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia CCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015 Communication number s : 2537/2015 Author: Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Colombia Submission date 11 Aug 2014 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2501/en-US
BAKANOVA v. Lithuania
BAKANOVA v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigations into the death of the applicant s husband in 2007 on board of a ship off the coast of Brazil. Article 2 procedural limb EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4367
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania LTU 07/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate limitation of the applicant s right of access to a tribunal due to the refusal of the Supreme Court in 2017 to partly exempt him EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55627
BALSYTE-LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania
BALSYTE LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania LTU 04/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the inability in administrative proceedings to question the experts on whose expert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4213
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 16/04/2019 00:00:00 25/04/2019 11:23:50 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the lack of adequate reasoning for a refusal of the domestic courts in 2016 to refer a question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51955
BASKIENE v. Lithuania
BASKIENE v. Lithuania LTU 10/12/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court and the excessive length of civil proceedings seeking to have shares redeemed by a company. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4253
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375