Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
CASE OF CRAXI v. ITALY (No. 2)
CASE OF CRAXI v. ITALY No. 2 25337/94 N/A ITA 7/17/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 with regard to release of transcripts into the public domain Violation of Art. 8 with regard to reading out of transcripts at trial Pecuniary damage claim dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0717JUD002533794https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61229
CASE OF EMONET AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF EMONET AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND 39051/03 ZELLWEGER C. CHE 12/13/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed ratione materiae non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage financial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1213JUD003905103https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83992
CASE OF GILLBERG v. SWEDEN
CASE OF GILLBERG v. SWEDEN 41723/06 CRAFOORD C. BJERNSTAM B. ROGALSKA HEDLUND A. SWE 4/3/2012 12:00:00 AM Inapplicable Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Inapplicable Article 8 1 Respect for private life Article 8 2 Interference Chapter 2 Sections 1 3 6 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD004172306https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110144
CASE OF K.J. v. POLAND
CASE OF K.J. v. POLAND 30813/14 THUAN DIT DIEUDONNE G. POL 3/1/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0301JUD003081314https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161002
CASE OF LUSTIG-PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF LUSTIG PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 31417/96 32377/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 Just satisfaction reserved Army Act 1955 Air Force Act 1955 Naval Discipline Act 1957 Sexual ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003141796https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58407
CASE OF M.S. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF M.S. v. SWEDEN 20837/92 SWE 8/27/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 13 Secrecy Act 1980 chapter 7 sections 1 and 7 chapter 14 section 1 Industrial Injury Insurance Act 1976 chapter 8 sections 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0827JUD002083792https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58177
CASE OF MENTEŞ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF MENTE AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 23186/94 N/A TUR 11/28/1997 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Not necessary to examine Art. 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 18 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1128JUD002318694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58120
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND 10593/08 MCBRIDE J. CHE 9/12/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objections dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0912JUD001059308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113118
CASE OF POPOV v. FRANCE
CASE OF POPOV v. FRANCE 39472/07 39474/07 SEGUIN D. FRA 1/19/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0119JUD003947207https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108710
CASE OF ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. LUXEMBOURG
CASE OF ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. LUXEMBOURG 51772/99 N/A LUX 2/25/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award 149 148 201 265 331 327 451 429 426 203 268 333 329 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0225JUD005177299https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60958
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 33985/96 33986/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 3 or 14 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 or 14 10 Violation of Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003398596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58408
CASE OF TELEGRAAF MEDIA NEDERLAND LANDELIJKE MEDIA B.V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF TELEGRAAF MEDIA NEDERLAND LANDELIJKE MEDIA B.V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 39315/06 LE POLE R.S. DE KEMP M.A. NLD 11/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1122JUD003931506https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114439