Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 22
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND 36661/07 38433/07 KRUSZYNSKI P. SJ CRONA VAN STIGT ATTORNEYS POL 4/12/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412JUD003666107https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182169
CASE OF DEBLED v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DEBLED v. BELGIUM 13839/88 N/A BEL 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Royal Decree no. 79 of 10 November 1967 relating to the Ordre des m decins Articles 12 and 25 para. 4 al. 2 Act of 31 March 1967 Royal Decree of 6 February 1970 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001383988https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57888
CASE OF DENISOV v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DENISOV v. UKRAINE 76639/11 GAVRON J. HALBAN A. UKR 9/25/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925JUD007663911https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186216
CASE OF FAZIA ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FAZIA ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 40378/10 THE COMMUNITY LAW PARTNERSHIP GBR 10/20/2015 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6 1 Civil rights and obligations Independent tribunal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD004037810https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158031
CASE OF FRUNI v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF FRUNI v. SLOVAKIA 8014/07 SUVADOVA M. KUZMA M. PUCHOVSKY P. SVK 6/21/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Remainder inadmissible Article 127 of the Constitution Article 371 1 of the Code of Criminal procedure 448 220 227 404 438 337 445 76 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD000801407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105236
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 19750/13 DAJBYCH J. CZE 6/23/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD001975013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217806
CASE OF GRZĘDA v. POLAND
CASE OF GRZ DA v. POLAND 43572/18 PIETRZAK M. M CZKA PACHOLAK M. POL 3/15/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD004357218https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216400
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 11423/19 LYOSHENKO O. UKR 7/22/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD001142319https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211125
CASE OF HELLE v. FINLAND
CASE OF HELLE v. FINLAND 20772/92 N/A FIN 12/19/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Church Act 1964 1993 Church Act Chapter 19 sections 6 and 7 Supreme Administrative Court Act 1918 section 15 1996 Act on Judicial Procedure in Administrative Matters ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1219JUD002077292https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58126
CASE OF HENRYK URBAN AND RYSZARD URBAN v. POLAND
CASE OF HENRYK URBAN AND RYSZARD URBAN v. POLAND 23614/08 CICHON Z. POL 11/30/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Sections 134 136 of the Law of 27 July 2001 on the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130JUD002361408https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101962
CASE OF INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION v. UKRAINE
CASE OF INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION v. UKRAINE 10640/05 YASINSKIY V. REYNOLDS J. UKR 6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626JUD001064005https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184068
CASE OF ČIVINSKAITĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF IVINSKAIT v. LITHUANIA 21218/12 RU IEN A. LTU 9/15/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD002121812https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-204601
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND 35599/20 K ADOCZNY P. POL 10/6/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006JUD003559920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219563
CASE OF KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 39343/98 39651/98 43147/98 46664/99 N/A NLD 5/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Council of State Act section 15 445 180 181 13 14 128 109 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD003934398 CASE OF KLEYN AND OTHERS v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD003934398https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61077
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
CASE OF McGONNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF McGONNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28488/95 GBR 2/8/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected estoppel Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Bordeaux Vineries Ltd. v. States Board of Administration 4 August ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0208JUD002848895https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58461
CASE OF PABLA KY v. FINLAND
CASE OF PABLA KY v. FINLAND 47221/99 N/A FIN 6/22/2004 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 181 180 40 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622JUD004722199 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF PABLA KY v. FINLAND Application no. 47221/99 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 June 2004 FINAL ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622JUD004722199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61829
CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E S v. PORTUGAL 55391/13 57728/13 74041/13 RIBEIRO J. PRT 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Administrative proceedings Disciplinary proceedings Article 6 1 Impartial tribunal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005539113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164449
CASE OF SACILOR LORMINES v. FRANCE
CASE OF SACILOR LORMINES v. FRANCE 65411/01 SCHMITT R. FRA 11/9/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 as regard three points No violation of Art. 6 1 as regard one point Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award length of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109JUD006541101https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77947
CASE OF THIAM v. FRANCE
CASE OF THIAM v. FRANCE 80018/12 GANEM E. FRA 10/18/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Equality of arms Impartial tribunal Independent tribunal Article 2 of the Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1018JUD008001812https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187219