Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
CASE OF ANATOLIY YEREMENKO v. UKRAINE
CASE OF ANATOLIY YEREMENKO v. UKRAINE 22287/08 PANKRATOVA L.L. UKR 9/15/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0915JUD002228708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219194
CASE OF BOZHKOV v. BULGARIA
CASE OF BOZHKOV v. BULGARIA 3316/04 GROZEV Y. BGR 4/19/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Articles 78a 147 and 148 1 3 and 2 of the Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD000331604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104541
CASE OF CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA 33348/96 MOCANU CARAIANI M. ROU 12/17/2004 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses claim dismissed Criminal Code ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1217JUD003334896https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67816
CASE OF HALET v. LUXEMBOURG
CASE OF HALET v. LUXEMBOURG 21884/18 MEYER C. LUX 2/14/2023 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Freedom to impart information Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0214JUD002188418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-223259
CASE OF HALET v. LUXEMBOURG
CASE OF HALET v. LUXEMBOURG 21884/18 MEYER C. LUX 5/11/2021 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 265 326 579 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD002188418 THIRD SECTIONCASE OF HALET v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD002188418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210131
CASE OF MARGULEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF MARGULEV v. RUSSIA 15449/09 KOSTROMINA K. RUS 10/8/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Violation of Article 10 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD001544909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-196480
CASE OF MEDŽLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRČKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MED LIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BR KO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 17224/11 MULAHALILOVICH O. BIH 6/27/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Section 6 of the Defamation Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD001722411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175180
CASE OF MILJEVIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF MILJEVI v. CROATIA 68317/13 KOSTANJ EK Z. HRV 6/25/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD006831713https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203169
CASE OF MORICE v. FRANCE
CASE OF MORICE v. FRANCE 29369/10 AUDHOUI C. TARDIF J. FRA 4/23/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Impartial tribunal Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD002936910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154265
CASE OF OOO MEMO v. RUSSIA
CASE OF OOO MEMO v. RUSSIA 2840/10 SOBOLEVA A. RUS 3/15/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Article 152 of the Russian Civil Code 451 429 149 148 265 579 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD000284010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216179
CASE OF SEDLETSKA v. UKRAINE
CASE OF SEDLETSKA v. UKRAINE 42634/18 ZAYETS S. PANKRATOVA L. UKR 4/1/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0401JUD004263418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208882
CASE OF TILLACK v. BELGIUM
CASE OF TILLACK v. BELGIUM 20477/05 FORRESTER I. BOSLY T. BEL 11/27/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic and Convention proceedings total 149 148 265 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD002047705https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83527