Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10
CASE OF DALIA v. FRANCE
CASE OF DALIA v. FRANCE 26102/95 N/A FRA 2/19/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 3 Public Health Code Article L. 630 1 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002610295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58130
CASE OF JALLOH v. GERMANY
CASE OF JALLOH v. GERMANY 54810/00 BUSCH U. DEU 7/11/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 No separate issue under Art. 8 Violation of Art. 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0711JUD005481000https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76307
CASE OF MOLDOVAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
CASE OF MOLDOVAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA No. 2 41138/98 64320/01 EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTER ROU 7/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 1 access to court Violation of Art. 6 1 length of proceedings Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0712JUD004113898https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69670
CASE OF NICOLAE VIRGILIU TĂNASE v. ROMANIA
CASE OF NICOLAE VIRGILIU T NASE v. ROMANIA 41720/13 TANASE D.I. ROU 6/25/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625JUD004172013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194307
CASE OF POPOV v. FRANCE
CASE OF POPOV v. FRANCE 39472/07 39474/07 SEGUIN D. FRA 1/19/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0119JUD003947207https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108710
CASE OF RANINEN v. FINLAND
CASE OF RANINEN v. FINLAND 20972/92 FIN 12/16/1997 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 2 No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002097292https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58123
CASE OF SELÇUK AND ASKER v. TURKEY
CASE OF SEL UK AND ASKER v. TURKEY 23184/94 23185/94 N/A TUR 4/24/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0424JUD002318494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58162
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 33985/96 33986/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 3 or 14 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 or 14 10 Violation of Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003398596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58408
CASE OF TERESHCHENKO v. RUSSIA
CASE OF TERESHCHENKO v. RUSSIA 33761/05 FINOGENOV P. RUS 6/5/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0605JUD003376105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144357
CASE OF VILNES AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF VILNES AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 52806/09 22703/10 LUDVIGSEN E. JOHNSRUD E. HELLUM LILLEENGEN K. BENTSEN H. NOR 12/5/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD005280609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138597