Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 641 - 660 of 810
CASE OF ÖZTÜRK v. GERMANY
CASE OF ZT RK v. GERMANY 8544/79 N/A DEU 2/21/1984 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 3 e Just satisfaction reserved Regulatory Offences Act 1968/1975 Gesetz ber Ordnungswidrigkeiten Section 17 Road Traffic Act Strassenverkehrsgesetz Section 24 sub section 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0221JUD000854479https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57553
CASE OF ZWIAZEK NAUCZYCIELSTWA POLSKIEGO v. POLAND
CASE OF ZWIAZEK NAUCZYCIELSTWA POLSKIEGO v. POLAND 42049/98 N/A POL 9/21/2004 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings 445 7 40 444 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0921JUD004204998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-66638
Cabreira de Estradet v. Uruguay
Cabreira de Estradet v. Uruguay CCPR/C/19/D/105/1981 Communication number s : 105/1981 Author: Maria A. Cabreira de Estradet alleged victim s mother Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 19 Country Uruguay Submission date 07 Aug 1981 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/19/D/105/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/609/en-US
Cedeño v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Cede o v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/106/D/1940/2010 Communication number s : 1940/2010 Author: Eligio Cede o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date 09 Mar 2010 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1940/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1463/en-US
Christian Nekvedavičius v. Lithuania
Christian Nekvedavi ius v. Lithuania CCPR/C/121/D/2802/2016 Communication number s : 2802/2016 Author: Christian Nekvedavi ius Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jul 2014 Date of decision 09 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2802/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2364/en-US
Cochet v. France
Cochet v. France CCPR/C/100/D/1760/2008/REV.1 Communication number s : 1760/2008 Author: Jean Pierre Cochet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country France Submission date 04 Dec 2007 Date of decision 21 Oct 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1760/2008/REV.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3224/en-US
Conclusions IX-1 - Pays-Bas - Article 12-4
Conclusions IX 1 Pays Bas Article 12 4 NLD 12 04 000 30/06/1985 30/06/1985 Article 12 Right to social security Paragraph 4 Social security of persons moving between states The Committee noted in the Netherlands report that a bilateral social security ESCIX-1/def/NLD/12/4/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=IX-1/def/NLD/12/4/EN
Conclusions VIII - Pays-Bas - Article 1-1
Conclusions VIII Pays Bas Article 1 1 NLD 01 01 000 31/01/1984 31/01/1984 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 1 Policy of full employment The first Netherlands report permitted the committee to make an appreciation of the country s economic situation ESCVIII/def/NLD/1/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=VIII/def/NLD/1/1/EN
Conclusions VIII - Pays-Bas - Article 2-1
Conclusions VIII Pays Bas Article 2 1 NLD 02 01 000 31/01/1984 31/01/1984 Article 2 Right to just conditions of work Paragraph 1 Reasonable working time The committee noted in the Netherlands report that average weekly hours determined either by ESCVIII/def/NLD/2/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=VIII/def/NLD/2/1/EN
Conclusions X-1 - Pays-Bas - Article 1-1
Conclusions X 1 Pays Bas Article 1 1 NLD 01 01 000 30/06/1987 30/06/1985 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 1 Policy of full employment The Committee took note of the information contained in the NETHERLANDS report as well as of the steps taken by the ESCX-1/def/NLD/1/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=X-1/def/NLD/1/1/EN
Conclusions XVII-1 - Pays-Bas Aruba - Article 5
Conclusions XVII 1 Pays Bas Aruba Article 5 NLDABW 05 00 000 28/02/2005 28/02/2005 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee takes note of the information in the Dutch report concerning Aruba. It asks the next report to include information on developments ESCXVII-1/def/NLDABW/5//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVII-1/def/NLDABW/5//EN
Conclusions XVIII-1 - Pays-Bas Aruba - Article 5
Conclusions XVIII 1 Pays Bas Aruba Article 5 NLDABW 05 00 000 30/10/2006 30/10/2006 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee takes note of the information in the Netherlands report on Aruba. Forming trade unions and employer associations The first two ESCXVIII-1/def/NLDABW/5//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVIII-1/def/NLDABW/5//EN
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (ETS No. 104)
Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats ETS No. 104 104 Bern 1979 09 19T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and by the European Union and COEETS No. 104https://rm.coe.int/1680078aff
Convention on the Establishment of a Scheme of Registration of Wills (ETS No. 077)
Convention on the Establishment of a Scheme of Registration of Wills ETS No. 077 077 Basel 1972 05 16T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Basel 1976 03 20T00:00:00 3 Ratifications. This Convention COEETS No. 077https://rm.coe.int/16800730d1
D.A.M. v. Sweden
D.A.M. v. Sweden CCPR/C/128/D/3012/2017 Communication number s : 3012/2017 Author: D.A.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Sweden Submission date 04 Jul 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3012/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2834/en-US
Decision on the merits: Association for the Protection of All Children (APPROACH) Ltd. v. France, Complaint No. 92/2013
Decision on the merits: Association for the Protection of All Children APPROACH Ltd. v. France Complaint No. 92/2013 FRA 17 01 163 2014 09 12 2015 03 04 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: ESCcc-92-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-92-2013-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Association for the Protection of All Children (APPROACH) v. Italy
Decision on the merits: Association for the Protection of All Children APPROACH v. Italy ITA 17 01 163 2014 12 05 2015 04 15 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 5 December 2014 ESCcc-94-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-94-2013-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Association for the Protection of all Children (APPROACH) Ltd v. Belgium, Complaint No. 98/2013
Decision on the merits: Association for the Protection of all Children APPROACH Ltd v. Belgium Complaint No. 98/2013 BEL 17 01 163 2015 01 20 2015 05 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: ESCcc-98-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-98-2013-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Association for the Protection of all Children (APPROACH) Ltd v. Czech Republic, Complaint No. 96/2013
Decision on the merits: Association for the Protection of all Children APPROACH Ltd v. Czech Republic Complaint No. 96/2013 CZE 17 00 035 2015 01 20 2015 05 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS ESCcc-96-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-96-2013-dmerits-en