Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 161 - 180 of 278
CASE OF X v. LATVIA
CASE OF X v. LATVIA 27853/09 STRAUSS R. LVA 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Section 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Act 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138992
CASE OF XHOXHAJ v. ALBANIA
CASE OF XHOXHAJ v. ALBANIA 15227/19 SACCUCCI A. BORGNA G. ALB 2/9/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae No violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0209JUD001522719https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208053
CASE OF YANAKIEV v. BULGARIA
CASE OF YANAKIEV v. BULGARIA 40476/98 RUNEVSKI N. BGR 8/10/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Determination civil Pecuniary and non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD004047698https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76682
CASE OF ZBOROVSKÝ v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF ZBOROVSK v. SLOVAKIA 14325/08 MACKO M. SVK 10/23/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD001432508https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113929
CASE OF ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. UKRAINE
CASE OF ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. UKRAINE 846/16 1075/16 TARAKHKALO M. BUSHCHENKO A. UKR 5/22/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Respondent ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522JUD000084616https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183128
CASE OF ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY
CASE OF ZT RK v. TURKEY 22479/93 TUR 9/28/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine P1 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Criminal Code Articles 142 312 Press Act Law no. 5680 section 16 4 Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0928JUD002247993https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58305
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Germany
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Germany 19 July 2002 GVT/COM/INF/OP/I 2002 008 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY ON THE OPINION OF THE FCNMhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_Com_Germany_en
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Poland
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on Poland POL GVT/COM/IV 2020 002 GVT/COM/IV 2020 002 Comments of the Government of Poland on the Fourth Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the FCNMGVT/COM/IV(2020)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_COM_Poland_EN
Conclusions 2011 - Italy - Article 31-1
Conclusions 2011 Italy Article 31 1 ITA 31 01 163 09/12/2011 17/01/2012 Article 31 Right to housing Paragraph 1 Adequate housing The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Italy. The Committee recalls that in its ESC2011/def/ITA/31/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2011/def/ITA/31/1/EN
Conclusions XV-2 - Pays-Bas - Article 11-1
Conclusions XV 2 Pays Bas Article 11 1 NLD 11 01 000 31/12/2001 31/12/2001 Article 11 Right to protection of health Paragraph 1 Removal of the causes of ill health The Committee takes note of the information provided in the Dutch report on the Charter and ESCXV-2/def/NLD/11/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XV-2/def/NLD/11/1/EN
Conclusions XVI-1 - Pays-Bas - Article 16
Conclusions XVI 1 Pays Bas Article 16 NLD 16 00 000 30/05/2003 30/05/2003 Article 16 Right of the family to social legal and economic protection The Committee takes note of the information in the report of the Netherlands. Legal protection of the family ESCXVI-1/def/NLD/16//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVI-1/def/NLD/16//EN
Conclusions XVI-1 - Pays-Bas - Article 6-2
Conclusions XVI 1 Pays Bas Article 6 2 NLD 06 02 000 30/05/2003 30/05/2003 Article 6 Right to bargain collectively Paragraph 2 Negotiation procedures The Netherlands report says that discussions on reforming the system of social dialogue in the public ESCXVI-1/def/NLD/6/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVI-1/def/NLD/6/2/EN
Conclusions XVII-1 - Pays-Bas Aruba - Article 1-1
Conclusions XVII 1 Pays Bas Aruba Article 1 1 NLDABW 01 01 000 28/02/2005 28/02/2005 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 1 Policy of full employment The Committee takes note of the information provided in the report from the Netherlands with regard to ESCXVII-1/def/NLDABW/1/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVII-1/def/NLDABW/1/1/EN
Conclusions XX-4 - Poland - Article 19-1
Conclusions XX 4 Poland Article 19 1 POL 19 01 000 04/12/2015 27/01/2016 Article 19 Right of migrant workers and their families to protection and assistance Paragraph 1 Assistance and information on migration The Committee takes note of the information ESCXX-4/def/POL/19/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XX-4/def/POL/19/1/EN
D.Z. v. Netherlands
D.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016 Communication number s : 2918/2016 Author: D.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Nov 2016 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3295/en-US
Decision on the merits: STTK ry and Tehy ry v. Finland, Collective Complaint No.10/2000
Decision on the merits: STTK ry and Tehy ry v. Finland Collective Complaint No.10/2000 FIN 02 04 035 17/10/2001 20/02/2002 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 17 October 2001 Notification: ESCcc-10-2000-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-10-2000-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Norway, Complaint No. 135/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. Norway Complaint No. 135/2016 NOR 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-135-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-135-2016-dmerits-en
E.P. and F.P. v. Denmark
E.P. and F.P. v. Denmark CCPR/C/115/D/2344/2014 Communication number s : 2344/2014 Author: E.P. and F.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2014 Date of decision 02 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2344/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2024/en-US
Eleventh Activity Report (2016-2018)
Eleventh Activity Report 2016 2018 ACFC/INF 2018 001 2018 05 31 2018 10 01 Strasbourg 31 May 2018 Restricted ACFC/INF 2018 001 Eleventh activity report covering the period 1 June 2016 31 May 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE ADVISORY FCNMACFC/INF (2018)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=11th_Activity_Report_2016_2018
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT IRELAND
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT IRELAND IRL 2014 10 10 2014 11 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-3E-Final-Ireland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-3E-Final-Ireland-PUBLIC