Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 62
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A/HRC/47/13: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Myanmar
United Nations A/HRC/47/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/13https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4713-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-myanmar
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF A.P. GAR ON AND NICOT v. FRANCE 79885/12 52471/13 52596/13 SCP GATINEAU FATTACCINI SCP THOUIN PALAT BOUCARD FOURNIER J. PIERRAT E. FRA 4/6/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD007988512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172913
CASE OF A.W.Q. AND D.H. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.W.Q. AND D.H. v. THE NETHERLANDS 25077/06 HILLEN P. NLD 1/12/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Afghanistan 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD002507706 THIRD SECTION CASE OF A.W.Q. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD002507706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159805
CASE OF ANDREJEVA v. LATVIA
CASE OF ANDREJEVA v. LATVIA 55707/00 BUZAJEVS V. LVA 2/18/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Articles 90 and 471 of the Civil Procedure Act Article 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0218JUD005570700https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91388
CASE OF ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF ILA CU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 48787/99 N/A MDA RUS 7/8/2004 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect the Republic of Moldova ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004878799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886
CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 55508/07 29520/09 SZEWCZYK J. KAMINSKI I. NOWOSIELSKI R. SOCHANSKI B. KARPINSKIY R. STAVITSKAYA A. RUS 10/21/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione temporis ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD005550807https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-127684
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA 36376/04 IOFFE M.L. LVA 5/17/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 Article 14 and Chapter IX of the 1926 Criminal Code of Soviet Russia Article 68 3 of the 1961 Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98669
CASE OF L.B. v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF L.B. v. LITHUANIA 38121/20 IVA AUSKAIT I. LTU 6/14/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement Article 2 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom to leave a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD003812120https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217703
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF MANOLE AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF MANOLE AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA 13936/02 NAGACEVSCHI V. GRIBINCEA V. MDA 9/17/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Violation of Art. 10 Just satisfaction reserved Article 4 of Governmental Decision No. 502 1996 Article 13 2 of Law No. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917JUD001393602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-94075
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF PER N EK v. SWITZERLAND 27510/08 CENGIZ M. CHE 12/17/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD002751008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139724
CASE OF PETUKHOV v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
CASE OF PETUKHOV v. UKRAINE No. 2 41216/13 BUSHCHENKO A.P. TARAKHKALO M.O. KARAMAN I.V BOYKOVA I.A. UKR 3/12/2019 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312JUD004121613https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-191703
CASE OF SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 38450/05 STICHTING RUSSIAN JUSTICE INITIATIVE DOROGOVA L. RUS 6/6/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Locus standi No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0606JUD003845005https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-120070
D.Z. v. Netherlands
D.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016 Communication number s : 2918/2016 Author: D.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Nov 2016 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3295/en-US
Fourth General Report on GRETA's activities covering the period 1 August 2013 to 30 September 2014
Fourth General Report on GRETA s activities covering the period 1 August 2013 to 30 September 2014 2015 04 16 G R E T A Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA 2015 1 Fourth General Report on GRETA s activities covering the GRETAGEN--2015-1-ENGhttps://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=GEN--2015-1-ENG
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the Philippines, Algeria and Poland
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the Philippines Algeria and Poland. Teofilo S. Pilando Deputy Executive Secretary Vice Minister Office of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-philippines