Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 287
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013 Communication number s : 2273/2013 Author: Andrea Vandom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 07 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2496/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF AHMET H SREV ALTAN v. TURKEY 13252/17 ALBUGA ALIKU U F. TUR 4/13/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0413JUD001325217https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209444
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 48876/08 ALLEN T. GBR 4/22/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 Television Act 1954 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0422JUD004887608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119244
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND 889/19 43987/16 SURBER B. CHE 11/17/2020 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117JUD000088919https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206153
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF CARABULEA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CARABULEA v. ROMANIA 45661/99 EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE MACOVEI M. DAGALITA A. POPESCU N. ROU 7/13/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 2 substantive aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD004566199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99911
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF COMMUNIST PARTY OF RUSSIA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF COMMUNIST PARTY OF RUSSIA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 29400/05 KASPAROV G. RUS 6/19/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 13 Right ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619JUD002940005https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111522
CASE OF DUBSKÁ AND KREJZOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF DUBSK AND KREJZOV v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 28859/11 28473/12 ZAHUMENSKY D. HOREJSI R. CZE 12/11/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life Medical Services Act 451 429 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD002885911https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148632
CASE OF EBRAHIMIAN v. FRANCE
CASE OF EBRAHIMIAN v. FRANCE 64846/11 WORD W. FRA 11/26/2015 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 9 Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article 9 1 Manifest religion or belief 154 237 269 377 320 238 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1126JUD006484611 FIFTH ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1126JUD006484611https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159070
CASE OF ECODEFENCE AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ECODEFENCE AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 9988/13 14338/14 45973/14 48431/14 59787/14 4798/15 7098/15 13474/15 14070/15 24773/15 25934/15 27654/15 32412/15 32423/15 37043/15 42351/15 44403/15 47695/15 49258/15 52257/15 55272/15 55280/15 57310/15 57931/15 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD000998813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217751
CASE OF F.H. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF F.H. v. SWEDEN 32621/06 BREDBERG H. SWE 1/20/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 3 Chapter 1 Article 8 of the Penal Code Chapter 8 sections 8 11 and 14 Chapter 12 sections 4 14 and 20 of the 2005 Aliens Act 350 90 193 449 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD003262106https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90743
CASE OF FADEYEVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF FADEYEVA v. RUSSIA 55723/00 KOROTEYEV Kirill VEDERNIKOVA Dina BOWRING Bill LEACH Phillip RUS 6/9/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0609JUD005572300https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69315