Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 541 - 560 of 689
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS NLD 2013 06 21 2013 07 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY NOR 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors INTERIM COMPLIANCE REPORT NETHERLANDS
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors INTERIM COMPLIANCE REPORT NETHERLANDS NLD 2016 10 21 2016 12 08 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on the Netherlands was adopted at GRECOGrecoRC4-2016-10-en-Final-Interim-Netherlands-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2016-10-en-Final-Interim-Netherlands-PUBLIC
Faure v. Australia
Faure v. Australia CCPR/C/85/D/1036/2001 Communication number s : 1036/2001 Author: Bernadette Faure Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Australia Submission date 19 Jun 2001 Date of decision 31 Oct 2005 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1036/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1218/en-US
First Opinion on the Netherlands
First Opinion on the Netherlands NLD ACFC/OP/I 2009 002 2009 06 25 Strasbourg 17 February 2010 ACFC/OP/I 2009 002 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Opinion on the Netherlands Adopted on 25 June 2009 FCNMACFC/OP/I(2009)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_OP_Netherlands_en
First report on Bulgaria
First report on Bulgaria BGR 1997 09 18 1998 06 15 Council of EuropeCRI 98 46 European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance First report on Bulgaria Adopted on 15 June 1998 For further information about the work of the European Commission against ECRIBGR-CbC-I-1998-046-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=BGR-CbC-I-1998-046-ENG
Fourth Evaluation Round Corruption prevention in respect of members ofparliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT ROMANIA
Fourth Evaluation Round Corruption prevention in respect of members ofparliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT ROMANIA ROU 2017 12 08 2018 01 18 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Romanian authorities to GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-24-Final-eng-Romania-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-24-Final-eng-Romania-PUBLIC
G.I. v. Denmark
G.I. v. Denmark CAT/C/61/D/625/2014 Communication number s : 625/2014 Author: G.I. represented by counsel Niels Erik Hansen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 10 Aug 2017 JUTBCAT/C/61/D/625/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2281/en-US
G.M.N.F. v. Netherlands
G.M.N.F. v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/75/D/117/2017 Communication number s : 117/2017 Author: G.M.N.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Apr 2017 Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/117/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3129/en-US
G.T. v. Canada
G.T. v. Canada CCPR/C/46/D/420/1990 Communication number s : 420/1990 Author: G.T. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Canada Submission date 22 Mar 1990 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/420/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/557/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - ROMANIA
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ROMANIA ROU a13 a20 a22 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon
Gorji Dinka v. Cameroon CCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002 Communication number s : 1134/2002 Author: Fongum Gorji Dinka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Cameroon Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 17 Mar 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1174/en-US
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia CRPD/C/24/D/20/2014 Communication number s : 20/2014 Author: Grainne Sherlock Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Australia Submission date 24 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/24/D/20/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3069/en-US
Grioua v. Algeria
Grioua v. Algeria CCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004 Communication number s : 1327/2004 Author: Messaouda Grioua n e Atamna Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Oct 2004 Date of decision 10 Jul 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1367/en-US
H.C.M.A. v. Netherlands
H.C.M.A. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/213/1986 Communication number s : 213/1986 Author: H.C.M.A. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 31 Oct 1986 Date of decision 30 Mar 1989 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/213/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/303/en-US
H.K v. Australia
H.K v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/701/2015 Communication number s : 701/2015 Author: H.K Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60th session Country Australia Submission date 16 Sep 2015 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: Views violation. JUTBCAT/C/60/D/701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2327/en-US
H. v. Sweden
H. v. Sweden CAT/C/58/D/627/2014 Communication number s : 627/2014 Author: H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Aug 2014 Date of decision 05 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/627/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3012/en-US
Hagan v. Australia
Hagan v. Australia CERD/C/62/D/26/2002 Communication number s : 026/2002 Author: Stephen Hagan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Australia Submission date 31 Jul 2002 Date of decision 20 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/62/D/26/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1745/en-US
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands CCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014 Communication number s : 2489/2014 Author: Jamshed Hashemi and Maryam Hashemi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 2013 Date of decision 26 JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3321/en-US
Hendriks v. Netherlands
Hendriks v. Netherlands CCPR/C/33/D/201/1985 Communication number s : 201/1985 Author: Wim Hendriks Sr. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 33 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Dec 1985 Date of decision 27 Jul 1988 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/33/D/201/1985https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/711/en-US