Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 441 - 460 of 614
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) Slovenia
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention Slovenia SVN exe 2021 06 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
González Cruz v. Spain
Gonz lez Cruz v. Spain CCPR/C/88/D/1151/2003 Communication number s : 1151/2003 Author: Estela Josefina Gonz lez Cruz Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Spain Submission date 25 May 2001 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1151/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1312/en-US
Government comments on the fifth report on the Netherlands
Government comments on the fifth report on the Netherlands NLD 2019 04 02 2019 06 04 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Netherlands ECRI in accordance ECRINLD-COM-V-2019-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NLD-COM-V-2019-019-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Greece
Government comments on the fourth report on Greece GRC 2009 04 02 2009 09 15 Government comments on the report on GREECE APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Greece ECRI ECRIGRC-COM-IV-2009-031-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GRC-COM-IV-2009-031-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway NOR 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on NORWAY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway ECRI ECRINOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Germany
Government comments on the second report on Germany DEU 2000 12 15 2001 07 03 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Germany. ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDEU-COM-II-2001-036-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DEU-COM-II-2001-036-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands NLD 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Netherlands ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis ECRINLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENG
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland CCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004 Communication number s : 1306/2004 Author: Erlingur Sveinn Haraldsson and rn Sn var Sveinsson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Iceland Submission date 15 Sep 2003 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1375/en-US
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands CCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014 Communication number s : 2489/2014 Author: Jamshed Hashemi and Maryam Hashemi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 2013 Date of decision 26 JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3321/en-US
Hendriks v. Netherlands
Hendriks v. Netherlands CCPR/C/33/D/201/1985 Communication number s : 201/1985 Author: Wim Hendriks Sr. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 33 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Dec 1985 Date of decision 27 Jul 1988 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/33/D/201/1985https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/711/en-US
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010 Communication number s : 1973/2010 Author: Hew Raymond Griffiths represented by counsels Joanna Mansfield and Nicolas Patrick Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1893/en-US
Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/46/Add.1 from 27 July 2005 to 29 July 2005 27 March 2006 Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights Mozambique UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social UNSPE/CN.4/2006/46/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f46%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights
Report to HRC A/HRC/20/23/Add.2 from 25 July 2011 to 5 August 2011 11 June 2012 Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights particularly UNSPA/HRC/20/23/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f20%2f23%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Irving v. Australia
Irving v. Australia CCPR/C/74/D/880/1999 Communication number s : 880/1999 Author: Terry Irving Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Australia Submission date 05 Oct 1999 Date of decision 01 Apr 2002 Comment: Under rule 84 a of JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/880/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/962/en-US
J.A.M.B.-R. v. Netherlands
J.A.M.B. R. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/50/D/477/1991 Communication number s : 477/1991 Author: J.A.M.B. R. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 50 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Oct 1991 Date of decision 07 Apr 1994 JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/477/1991https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/629/en-US
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016 Communication number s : 2743/2016 Author: J.D.P. and K.E.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2846/en-US
J.P.K. v. Netherlands
J.P.K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/43/D/401/1990 Communication number s : 401/1990 Author: J.P.K. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Apr 1990 Date of decision 07 Nov 1991 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/401/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/387/en-US