Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 23
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. CHE 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138948
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22414/93 N/A GBR 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58004
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 24384/19 44234/20 DOS M. FRA 9/14/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Locus standi Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219333
CASE OF HÄMÄLÄINEN v. FINLAND
CASE OF H M L INEN v. FINLAND 37359/09 COJOCARIU C. FIN 7/16/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0716JUD003735909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145768
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 29750/09 SHINER P. OTTY T. HICKMAN T. GBR 9/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146501
CASE OF HERRMANN v. GERMANY
CASE OF HERRMANN v. GERMANY 9300/07 KLEINE COSACK M. DEU 6/26/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD000930007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111690
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE 73316/01 CLEMENT H. FRA 7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and rejected victim Violation of Art. 4 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Criminal Code former Articles 225 13 225 14 Information ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD007331601https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69891
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Germany
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Germany CRC/C/88/D/107/2019 Communication number s : 107/2019 Author: Chiara Sacchi Catarina Lorenzo Iris Duquesne Raina Ivanova Ridhima Pandey David Ackley III Ranton Anjain Litokne Kabua Deborah Adegbile Carlos Manuel Ayakha JUTBCRC/C/88/D/107/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2955/en-US
F.B. et al. v. France
F.B. et al. v. France CRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019 Communication number s : 77/2019 Author: F.B. et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 86 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3575/en-US
K.S. and N.K. v. New Zealand
K.S. and N.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/129/D/2769/2016 Communication number s : 2769/2016 Author: K.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country New Zealand Submission date 20 May 2016 Date of decision 24 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2769/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2848/en-US
L.H., L.H., D.A, C.D. and A.F. v. France
L.H. L.H. D.A C.D. and A.F. v. France CRC/C/85/D/79/2019 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 Author: L.H. L.H. D.A C.D. and A.F. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 85 Country France Submission date 13 Mar 2019 Date of decision 30 JUTBCRC/C/85/D/79/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3587/en-US
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/505/2012 Communication number s : 505/2012 Author: P.S.B. and T.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 08 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/55/D/505/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1968/en-US