Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 100
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL-ADSANI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL ADSANI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 35763/97 GBR 11/21/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 1 State Immunity Act 1978 section 1 1 350 492 310 445 41 7 293 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1121JUD003576397 CASE OF AL ADSANI v. THE UNITED ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1121JUD003576397https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59885
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. CHE 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138948
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF AL-NASHIF v. BULGARIA
CASE OF AL NASHIF v. BULGARIA 50963/99 N/A BGR 6/20/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies abuse of right of petition Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0620JUD005096399https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60522
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF ANHEUSER-BUSCH INC. v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF ANHEUSER BUSCH INC. v. PORTUGAL 73049/01 OHLGART D. GOEBEL B. PRT 1/11/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Legislative Decree no. 16/95 of 24 January 1995 Code of Industrial Property 369 509 311 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD007304901 GRAND CHAMBER ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD007304901https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-78981
CASE OF BALAKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BALAKIN v. RUSSIA 21788/06 DMITROVSKAYA ZH. RUS 7/4/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Articles 51 1 4 and 57 2 of the new Housing Code ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0704JUD002178806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122261
CASE OF BAYBASIN v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BAYBASIN v. THE NETHERLANDS 13600/02 SERRARENS J. NLD 7/6/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Just satisfaction reserved 14 128 26 126 243 183 498 350 90 193 451 429 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0706JUD001360002 THIRD ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0706JUD001360002https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76262
CASE OF BEYELER v. ITALY
CASE OF BEYELER v. ITALY 33202/96 N/A ITA 1/5/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected estoppel Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 No separate issue under Art. 18 Just satisfaction reserved Law no. 1089 of 1 June 1939 sections 3 30 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0105JUD003320296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58832
CASE OF BURDEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BURDEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 13378/05 GEDYE E. GBR 4/29/2008 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed victim non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Section 18 1 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 Civil Partnership Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429JUD001337805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86146
CASE OF BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 3289/10 EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE UKR 11/6/2018 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106JUD000328910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187508
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA 49429/99 N/A BGR 11/24/2005 12:00:00 AM Government s request for strike out rejected Violations of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD004942999https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-71299
CASE OF CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN C MPEANU v. ROMANIA 47848/08 COJOCARIU C. ROU 7/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Locus standi Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD004784808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145577
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22414/93 N/A GBR 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58004