Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 202
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Czech Republic, Complaint No. 128/2016
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe UWE v. Czech Republic Complaint No. 128/2016 CZE 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ ESCcc-128-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-128-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Portugal, Complaint No. 136/2016
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe UWE v. Portugal Complaint No. 136/2016 PRT 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-136-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-136-2016-dmerits-en
E.L. v. Canada
E.L. v. Canada CAT/C/48/D/370/2009 Communication number s : 370/2009 Author: E.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Canada Submission date 14 Jan 2009 Date of decision 21 May 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/48/D/370/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/33/en-US
European Convention on Cinematographic Co-Production (ETS No. 147)
European Convention on Cinematographic Co Production ETS No. 147 147 Strasbourg 1992 10 02T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the other States Parties to the European Cultural Convention and for accession by the other European non COEETS No. 147https://rm.coe.int/168007bd2d
European Convention on Social and Medical Assistance (ETS No. 014)
European Convention on Social and Medical Assistance ETS No. 014 014 Paris 1953 12 11T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Paris 1954 07 01T00:00:00 2 Ratifications. Under this Convention Parties COEETS No. 014https://rm.coe.int/16800637c2
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LATVIA
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LATVIA LVA 2018 06 22 2018 08 21 Adoption: 22 June 2018 Publication: 21 August 2018 Public GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-6-Final-eng-Latvia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-6-Final-eng-Latvia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of Parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of Parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA MDA 2016 07 01 2016 07 05 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-6-eng-Final-Moldova-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-6-eng-Final-Moldova-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT TURKEY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT TURKEY TUR 2017 10 18 2018 03 15 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Turkey to GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-16-Final-eng-Turkey-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-16-Final-eng-Turkey-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT GREECE
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT GREECE GRC 2015 06 19 2015 10 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-9E-Final-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-9E-Final-Greece-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ICELAND
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ICELAND ISL 2013 03 22 2013 03 28 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-8E-Final-Iceland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-8E-Final-Iceland-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT LITHUANIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT LITHUANIA LTU 2014 12 12 2015 02 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-5E-Final-Lithuania-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-5E-Final-Lithuania-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS NLD 2013 06 21 2013 07 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY NOR 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SPAIN
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SPAIN ESP 2013 12 06 2014 01 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-5E-Final-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-5E-Final-Spain-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT TURKEY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT TURKEY TUR 2015 10 16 2016 03 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-3E-Final-Turkey-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-3E-Final-Turkey-PUBLIC
Faure v. Australia
Faure v. Australia CCPR/C/85/D/1036/2001 Communication number s : 1036/2001 Author: Bernadette Faure Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Australia Submission date 19 Jun 2001 Date of decision 31 Oct 2005 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1036/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1218/en-US
Fifth Opinion on Spain
Fifth Opinion on Spain ESP ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final 2020 05 27 2020 10 15 ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final Published on 15 October 2020 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2020)002Finalhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_Op_Spain_EN
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG