Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 189
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) v. Czech Republic, Complaint No.148/2017
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists ICJ v. Czech Republic Complaint No.148/2017 CZE 17 00 035 2020 10 20 2021 03 17 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 20 October ESCcc-148-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-148-2017-dmerits-en
Eleventh Activity Report (2016-2018)
Eleventh Activity Report 2016 2018 ACFC/INF 2018 001 2018 05 31 2018 10 01 Strasbourg 31 May 2018 Restricted ACFC/INF 2018 001 Eleventh activity report covering the period 1 June 2016 31 May 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE ADVISORY FCNMACFC/INF (2018)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=11th_Activity_Report_2016_2018
Eugénie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Eug nie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016 Communication number s : 2835/2016 Author: Eug nie Chakupewa et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3232/en-US
F.B. et al. v. France
F.B. et al. v. France CRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019 Communication number s : 77/2019 Author: F.B. et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 86 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3575/en-US
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS NLD 2013 06 21 2013 07 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY NOR 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIC
Faure v. Australia
Faure v. Australia CCPR/C/85/D/1036/2001 Communication number s : 1036/2001 Author: Bernadette Faure Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Australia Submission date 19 Jun 2001 Date of decision 31 Oct 2005 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1036/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1218/en-US
Fifth Opinion on Spain
Fifth Opinion on Spain ESP ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final 2020 05 27 2020 10 15 ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final Published on 15 October 2020 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2020)002Finalhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_Op_Spain_EN
First Opinion on the Netherlands
First Opinion on the Netherlands NLD ACFC/OP/I 2009 002 2009 06 25 Strasbourg 17 February 2010 ACFC/OP/I 2009 002 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Opinion on the Netherlands Adopted on 25 June 2009 FCNMACFC/OP/I(2009)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_OP_Netherlands_en
Fourth Opinion on Kosovo*
Fourth Opinion on Kosovo SRBKOS ACFC/OP/IV 2017 001 2017 03 08 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2017 001 Fourth Opinion on Kosovo adopted on 8 March 2017 Summary Moderate progress has been FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Kosovo_en
Fourth Thematic Commentary
Fourth Thematic Commentary ACFC/56DOC 2016 001 2016 05 27 2016 05 27 The Framework Convention: a key tool to managing diversity through minority rights Thematic commentary No. 4 The scope of application of the Framework Convention for the Protection of FCNMACFC/56DOC(2016)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=Fourth_Thematic_Commentary_EN
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - GERMANY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention GERMANY DEU a22 a57 aco GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia CRPD/C/24/D/20/2014 Communication number s : 20/2014 Author: Grainne Sherlock Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Australia Submission date 24 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/24/D/20/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3069/en-US
Hagan v. Australia
Hagan v. Australia CERD/C/62/D/26/2002 Communication number s : 026/2002 Author: Stephen Hagan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Australia Submission date 31 Jul 2002 Date of decision 20 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/62/D/26/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1745/en-US
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010 Communication number s : 1973/2010 Author: Hew Raymond Griffiths represented by counsels Joanna Mansfield and Nicolas Patrick Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1893/en-US
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 Communication number s : 2728/2016 Author: Ioane Teitiota Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Sep 2015 Date of decision 24 Oct 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2798/en-US
Isherwood v. New Zealand
Isherwood v. New Zealand CCPR/C/132/D/2976/2017 Communication number s : 2976/2017 Author: Garri Maui Isherwood Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Feb 2017 Date of decision 12 Jul 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2976/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3191/en-US
J.B. v. Switzerland
J.B. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/721/2015 Communication number s : 721/2015 Author: J.B. represented by counsel Boris Wijkstr m and Gabriella Tau Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/721/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2403/en-US
Jaddoe v. Netherlands
Jaddoe v. Netherlands CCPR/C/135/D/3256/2018 Communication number s : 3256/2018 Author: Dewradj Jaddoe Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jun 2017 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3256/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3644/en-US