Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1441 - 1460 of 1552
N. v. Netherlands
N. v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/57/D/39/2012 Communication number s : 039/2012 Author: N. represented by counsel Ilse van Kuilenburg Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 57 Country Netherlands Submission date 16 Feb 2012 Date of decision 17 Feb JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/39/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1877/en-US
Novotny v. Czech Republic
Novotny v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/98/D/1778/2008 Communication number s : 1778/2008 Author: Jaroslav Novotny Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Mar 2008 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1778/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1579/en-US
O.O.J v. Sweden
O.O.J v. Sweden CRPD/C/18/D/28/2015 Communication number s : 028/2015 Author: O.O.J Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 18 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Mar 2015 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/28/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2328/en-US
P.J.N. v. Netherlands
P.J.N. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/49/D/510/1992 Communication number s : 510/1992 Author: P.J.N. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Netherlands Submission date 28 Apr 1992 Date of decision 19 Oct 1993 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/49/D/510/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/401/en-US
P.M.C. v. Denmark
P.M.C. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/56/2013 Communication number s : 056/2013 Author: P.M.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 09 Jul 2013 Date of decision 09 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/56/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2080/en-US
P.P.C. v. Netherlands
P.P.C. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/32/D/212/1986 Communication number s : 212/1986 Author: P.P.C. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 32 Country Netherlands Submission date 27 Oct 1986 Date of decision 24 Mar 1988 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/32/D/212/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/408/en-US
Petersen v. Germany
Petersen v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002 Communication number s : 1115/2002 Author: Werner Petersen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 31 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/854/en-US
Picq v. France
Picq v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007 Communication number s : 1632/2007 Author: Raymond Jacques Picq Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 28 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1023/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
Polish Society of Anti-Discrimination Law v. Poland
Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law v. Poland CEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018 Communication number s : 136/2018 Author: Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Poland Submission date 13 Sep JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2660/en-US
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, restructuring the control machinery established thereby (ETS No. 155) (*)
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms restructuring the control machinery established thereby ETS No. 155 155 Strasbourg 1994 05 11T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an COEETS No. 155https://rm.coe.int/168007cda9
Protocol No. 16 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (CETS No. 214)
Protocol No. 16 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms CETS No. 214 214 Strasbourg 2013 10 02T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the High Contracting Parties to Treaty ETS 5 Strasbourg 2018 08 01T00:00:00 10 COECETS No. 214https://rm.coe.int/1680084832
Protocol No. 2 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, conferring upon the European Court of Human Rights competence to give advisory opinions (ETS No. 044) (*)
Protocol No. 2 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms conferring upon the European Court of Human Rights competence to give advisory opinions ETS No. 044 044 Strasbourg 1963 05 06T00:00:00 Since its entry into force COEETS No. 044https://rm.coe.int/168006b65a
Protocol No. 3 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending Articles 29, 30 and 34 of the Convention (ETS No. 045) (*)
Protocol No. 3 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms amending Articles 29 30 and 34 of the Convention ETS No. 045 045 Strasbourg 1963 05 06T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part COEETS No. 045https://rm.coe.int/168006b65b
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (ETS No. 046)
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto ETS No. 046 046 Strasbourg 1963 09 COEETS No. 046https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c
Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty (ETS No. 114)
Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty ETS No. 114 114 Strasbourg 1983 04 28T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty COEETS No. 114https://rm.coe.int/168007952b
Protocol of Amendment to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (ETS No. 170) (*)
Protocol of Amendment to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes ETS No. 170 170 Strasbourg 1998 06 22T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part COEETS No. 170https://rm.coe.int/168007f2cc
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 009)
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 009 009 Paris 1952 03 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Paris 1954 05 18T00:00:00 10 Ratifications. The COEETS No. 009https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
Q.H.L. v. Australia
Q.H.L. v. Australia CCPR/C/107/D/1938/2010 Communication number s : 1938/2010 Author: Q.H.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Australia Submission date 19 Apr 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1938/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1320/en-US
R.E.I. v. Netherlands
R.E.I. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017 Communication number s : 3015/2017 Author: R.E.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3546/en-US