Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2061 - 2080 of 2261
Eftekhary v. Iran (Islamic Republic of),Norway
Eftekhary v. Iran Islamic Republic of Norway CAT/C/47/D/312/2007 Communication number s : 312/2007 Author: Hamid Reza Eftekhary Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 47 Country Iran Islamic Republic of Norway Submission date 24 Oct 2006 Date of JUTBCAT/C/47/D/312/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/41/en-US
F.B. et al. v. France
F.B. et al. v. France CRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019 Communication number s : 77/2019 Author: F.B. et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 86 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3575/en-US
F.K.M. v. Netherlands
F.K.M. v. Netherlands CAT/C/74/D/954/2019 Communication number s : 954/2019 Author: F.K.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Jun 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/954/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3458/en-US
F.K. v. Denmark
F.K. v. Denmark CAT/C/56/D/580/2014 Communication number s : 580/2014 Author: F.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Dec 2013 Date of decision 23 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/580/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2074/en-US
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LATVIA
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LATVIA LVA 2018 06 22 2018 08 21 Adoption: 22 June 2018 Publication: 21 August 2018 Public GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-6-Final-eng-Latvia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-6-Final-eng-Latvia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of Parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of Parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA MDA 2016 07 01 2016 07 05 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-6-eng-Final-Moldova-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-6-eng-Final-Moldova-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT TURKEY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT TURKEY TUR 2015 10 16 2016 03 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-3E-Final-Turkey-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-3E-Final-Turkey-PUBLIC
Faragollah et al. v. Switzerland
Faragollah et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/47/D/381/2009 Communication number s : 381/2009 Author: Abolghasem Faragollah et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 47 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Apr 2009 Date of decision 21 Nov 2011 JUTBCAT/C/47/D/381/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/46/en-US
Faurisson v. France
Faurisson v. France CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993 Communication number s : 550/1993 Author: Robert Faurisson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country France Submission date 02 Jan 1993 Date of decision 08 Nov 1996 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/550/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/654/en-US
Fifth Opinion on Spain
Fifth Opinion on Spain ESP ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final 2020 05 27 2020 10 15 ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final Published on 15 October 2020 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2020)002Finalhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_Op_Spain_EN
Fourth Thematic Commentary
Fourth Thematic Commentary ACFC/56DOC 2016 001 2016 05 27 2016 05 27 The Framework Convention: a key tool to managing diversity through minority rights Thematic commentary No. 4 The scope of application of the Framework Convention for the Protection of FCNMACFC/56DOC(2016)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=Fourth_Thematic_Commentary_EN
Fuad Jahani v. Switzerland
Fuad Jahani v. Switzerland CAT/C/46/D/357/2008 Communication number s : 357/2008 Author: Fuad Jahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Oct 2008 Date of decision 23 May 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/46/D/357/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/53/en-US
G.E. v. Germany
G.E. v. Germany CCPR/C/104/D/1789/2008 Communication number s : 1789/2008 Author: G.E. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 104 Country Germany Submission date 17 Mar 2008 Date of decision 26 Mar 2012 Comment: The texts of two individual JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1789/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1441/en-US
G.I. v. Denmark
G.I. v. Denmark CAT/C/61/D/625/2014 Communication number s : 625/2014 Author: G.I. represented by counsel Niels Erik Hansen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 10 Aug 2017 JUTBCAT/C/61/D/625/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2281/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
G.R. v. Australia
G.R. v. Australia CAT/C/57/D/605/2014 Communication number s : 605/2014 Author: G.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2014 Date of decision 13 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/605/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3008/en-US
G.T. v. Canada
G.T. v. Canada CCPR/C/46/D/420/1990 Communication number s : 420/1990 Author: G.T. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Canada Submission date 22 Mar 1990 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/420/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/557/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - ESTONIA
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ESTONIA EST a13 a15 a6 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)32_Estonia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)32_Estonia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - GERMANY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention GERMANY DEU a22 a57 aco GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US