Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2861 - 2880 of 2890
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US
Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/56/Add.1 from 26 June 2014 to 4 July 2014 20 July 2015 Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent Netherlands United Nations A/HRC/30/56/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 July 2015 Original: English Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/30/56/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f56%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 from 27 June 2014 to 30 June 2014 10 September 2018 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Montenegro United Nations A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 September 2018 English only Human UNSPA/HRC/39/46/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f39%2f46%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/53/24/Add.2 from 1 December 2022 to 9 December 2022 19 May 2023 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Luxembourg United Nations A/HRC/53/24/Add.2 General Assembly UNSPA/HRC/53/24/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f53%2f24%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.2 from 4 April 2009 to 9 April 2009 14 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Afghanistan United Nations UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X, Y and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/55/D/530/2012 Communication number s : 530/2012 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Nov 2012 Date of decision 04 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/530/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2073/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X v. Australia,Lebanon
X v. Australia Lebanon CAT/C/42/D/324/2007 Communication number s : 324/2007 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Australia Lebanon Submission date 02 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Apr 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/42/D/324/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/69/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia CCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018 Communication number s : 3254/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Latvia Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3494/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
X v. Netherlands v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands v. Netherlands CCPR/C/117/D/2729/2016 Communication number s : 2729/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Feb 2016 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2729/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2127/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
Y.F. v. Switzerland
Y.F. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/885/2018 Communication number s : 885/2018 Author: Y.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Sep 2018 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/885/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3366/en-US
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US