Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 481 - 500 of 766
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the Netherlands and South Africa
Human Rights Council MORNING 21 September 2012 Hears Address by Foreign Minister of Australia and Human Rights Minister of Burkina Faso Continues Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-netherlands
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the Philippines, Algeria and Poland
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the Philippines Algeria and Poland. Teofilo S. Pilando Deputy Executive Secretary Vice Minister Office of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-philippines
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
Human Rights Council holds general debate on universal periodic review
MORNING GENEVA 27 June 2016 The Human Rights Council this morning held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. In the general debate speakers underlined that the Universal Periodic Review should be conducted in an objective non biased UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2016/06/human-rights-council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review
Independent Expert on Extreme poverty
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/48 from 11 November 1998 to 14 November 1998 29 January 1999 Independent Expert on Extreme poverty Yemen UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/48 29 January 1999 ENGLISH Original: ENGLISH/FRENCH UNSPE/CN.4/1999/48https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f48&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/103 from 31 October 1998 to 13 November 1998 18 February 1999 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/103 18 February 1999 UNSPE/CN.4/1999/103https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f103&Lang=en
Isherwood v. New Zealand
Isherwood v. New Zealand CCPR/C/132/D/2976/2017 Communication number s : 2976/2017 Author: Garri Maui Isherwood Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Feb 2017 Date of decision 12 Jul 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2976/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3191/en-US
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US
Johar v. Norway
Johar v. Norway CCPR/C/132/D/2854/2016 Communication number s : 2854/2016 Author: Islam Johar Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Norway Submission date 06 Apr 2016 Date of decision 07 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2854/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3194/en-US
Kell v. Canada
Kell v. Canada CEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008 Communication number s : 019/2008 Author: Cecilia Kell Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jun 2008 Date of decision 28 Feb 2012 Comment: The text of one individual JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1718/en-US
L.P. v. Czech Republic
L.P. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/75/D/946/2000 Communication number s : 946/2000 Author: L.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 May 1999 Date of decision 25 Jul 2002 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/946/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1013/en-US
M.G.C v. Australia
M.G.C v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/1875/2009 Communication number s : 1875/2009 Author: M.G.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 07 Apr 2009 Date of decision 26 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1875/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1950/en-US
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012 Communication number s : 2136/2012 Author: M.M.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision Comment: The text of an individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1674/en-US
M.S.P.-B. v. Netherlands
M.S.P. B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/123/D/2673/2015 Communication number s : 2673/2015 Author: M.S.P. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2673/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2540/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
NETHERLANDS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NETHERLANDS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CED/C/NLD/CO/1 NULL 2014 04 09T00:00:00 CED United Nations CED/C/NLD/CO/1 International Convention for Distr.: General 10 April 2014 the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance Original: English Committee UHRICED/C/NLD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b8d55010-3401-4264-baf4-e32822a15743
NETHERLANDS : RECOMMENDATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY
NETHERLANDS : RECOMMENDATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/NLD/1 NULL 2016 11 02T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/NLD/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 3 November 2016 and Other Cruel Inhuman UHRICAT/OP/NLD/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/83cd455a-c481-4d60-9b46-f0df076a28bc
Nimal Silva Gunaratna v. Sri Lanka
Nimal Silva Gunaratna v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/95/D/1432/2005 Communication number s : 1432/2005 Author: Dalkadura Arachchige Nimal Silva Gunaratna Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 01 Aug 2005 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1432/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1499/en-US
O.O.J v. Sweden
O.O.J v. Sweden CRPD/C/18/D/28/2015 Communication number s : 028/2015 Author: O.O.J Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 18 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Mar 2015 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/28/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2328/en-US