Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 521 - 540 of 676
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) NETHERLANDS
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention NETHERLANDS NLD a15 a23 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2019)19_Netherlands_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2019)19_Netherlands_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) SAN MARINO
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention SAN MARINO SMR lps 2021 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2021)6_San-Marino_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2021)6_San-Marino_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway NOR 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on NORWAY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway ECRI ECRINOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
H.K. v. Switzerland
H.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/49/D/432/2010 Communication number s : 432/2010 Author: H.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Switzerland Submission date 01 Sep 2010 Date of decision 23 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/432/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/15/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of India, Finland, and the Philippines
AFTERNOON 27 March 2023 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of India Finland and the Philippines. The Council adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of India. The Vice President said 221 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-india-finland-and
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Spain and Kuwait, and holds enhanced interactive dialogue on in Sudan
Human Rights Council 16 July 2020 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Spain and Kuwait and held an enhanced interactive dialogue on progress towards opening a country office in Sudan. Cristobal Gonzales UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/general-comments-and-recommendations/2020/07/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review
Independent Expert on human rights in Burundi
Report to HRC A/HRC/17/50 from 8 November 2010 to 17 November 2010 31 May 2011 Independent Expert on human rights in Burundi Burundi United Nations A/HRC/17/50 Distr.: General 31 May 2011 General Assembly English Original: French Human Rights Council UNSPA/HRC/17/50https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f17%2f50&Lang=en
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US
J.K. v. Canada
J.K. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/562/2013 Communication number s : 562/2013 Author: J.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 29 Sep 2013 Date of decision 23 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/56/D/562/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2064/en-US
J.X.F.P. v. Australia
J.X.F.P. v. Australia CAT/C/75/D/770/2016 Communication number s : 770/2016 Author: J.X.F.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Australia Submission date 26 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/770/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3739/en-US
Jean Baptiste Mugimba v. Netherlands
Jean Baptiste Mugimba v. Netherlands CAT/C/66/D/768/2016 Communication number s : 768/2016 Author: Jean Baptiste Mugimba represented by counsels Bart Stapert Caroline Buisman and Devika Kamp Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country JUTBCAT/C/66/D/768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2578/en-US
Jean Claude Iyamuremye v. Netherlands
Jean Claude Iyamuremye v. Netherlands CAT/C/66/D/771/2016 Communication number s : 771/2016 Author: Jean Claude Iyamuremye represented by counsels Bart Stapert Caroline Buisman and Devika Kamp Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country JUTBCAT/C/66/D/771/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2579/en-US
Jong-bum Bae et al. v. Republic of Korea
Jong bum Bae et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/128/D/2846/2016 Communication number s : 2846/2016 Author: Jong bum Bae et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Sep 2016 Date of decision 13 JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2846/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2831/en-US
Kulov v. Kyrgyzstan
Kulov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/99/D/1369/2005 Communication number s : 1369/2005 Author: Felix Kulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 11 Nov 2004 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1369/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1569/en-US
Marques de Morais v. Angola
Marques de Morais v. Angola CCPR/C/83/D/1128/2002 Communication number s : 1128/2002 Author: Rafael Marques de Morais Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Angola Submission date 05 Sep 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2005 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1128/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1160/en-US
Meïssa Wade v. Senegal
Me ssa Wade v. Senegal CCPR/C/124/D/2783/2016 Communication number s : 2783/2016 Author: Karim Me ssa Wade Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Senegal Submission date 31 May 2016 Date of decision 23 Oct 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2783/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3325/en-US