Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 215
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
CASE OF A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND 19958/92 N/A CHE 8/29/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Ordinance on Direct Federal Tax ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0829JUD001995892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58178
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22954/93 N/A GBR 9/2/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 11 No violation of P1 3 Local Government and Housing Act 1989 sections 1 5 2 2 2 3 Schedule to the Local Government Officers ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0902JUD002295493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58222
CASE OF AHMED v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF AHMED v. AUSTRIA 25964/94 N/A AUT 12/17/1996 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction new complaint Violation of Art. 3 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1217JUD002596494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58001
CASE OF AKTAŞ v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKTA v. TURKEY 24351/94 N/A TUR 4/24/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0424JUD002435194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61055
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF AQUILINA v. MALTA
CASE OF AQUILINA v. MALTA 25642/94 N/A MLT 4/29/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits Preliminary objection rejected Violation of Art. 5 3 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002564294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58239
CASE OF ARGENTO v. ITALY
CASE OF ARGENTO v. ITALY 25842/94 N/A ITA 9/2/1997 12:00:00 AM Art. 6 inapplicable 445 41 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002584294 SOLDANI FUSCO DI LUCA AND SALUZZI PIZZI SCARF ARGENTO TROMBETTA CASES CASE OF ARGENTO v. ITALY 42/1996/661/847 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002584294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58093
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND 889/19 43987/16 SURBER B. CHE 11/17/2020 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117JUD000088919https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206153
CASE OF BEG S.P.A. v. ITALY
CASE OF BEG S.P.A. v. ITALY 5312/11 SACCUCCI A. LANA A.G. DESARIO M. ITA 5/20/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Impartial tribunal Independent tribunal Pecuniary damage claim dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD000531211https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210014
CASE OF BELDJOUDI v. FRANCE
CASE OF BELDJOUDI v. FRANCE 12083/86 N/A FRA 3/26/1992 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Expulsion Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0326JUD001208386https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57767
CASE OF BELZIUK v. POLAND
CASE OF BELZIUK v. POLAND 23103/93 N/A POL 3/25/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected incompetence ratione temporis non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 Non pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses claim dismissed Code of Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0325JUD002310393https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58145
CASE OF BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS 8848/80 N/A NLD 10/23/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 445 41 136 180 181 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:1023JUD000884880 COURT PLENARY CASE OF BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:1023JUD000884880https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57436
CASE OF BOTTA v. ITALY
CASE OF BOTTA v. ITALY 21439/93 N/A ITA 2/24/1998 12:00:00 AM Art. 8 inapplicable Art. 14 inapplicable Law no. 13 of 9 January 1989 sections 1 2 10 and 11 Law no. 104 of 5 February 1992 sections 23 3 41 8 and 42 451 429 343 100 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0224JUD002143993https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58140
CASE OF BOUGHANEMI v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUGHANEMI v. FRANCE 22070/93 N/A FRA 4/24/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 sections 19 22 25 Law no. 81 973 of 29 October 1981 Law no. 86 1025 of 9 September 1986 Law no. 89 548 of 2 August 1989 Law ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0424JUD002207093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57991
CASE OF BOUJLIFA v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUJLIFA v. FRANCE 25404/94 N/A FRA 10/21/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 concerning the conditions of entry and residence of aliens in France as modified by Laws no. 80 9 of 10 January 1980 no. 81 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1021JUD002540494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58106
CASE OF BRANNIGAN AND McBRIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRANNIGAN AND McBRIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 14553/89 14554/89 N/A GBR 5/26/1993 12:00:00 AM Derogation of Art. 5 3 satisfies the requirements of Art. 15 No violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 13 Prevention of Terrorism Temporary Provisions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0526JUD001455389https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57819
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 11209/84 11234/84 11266/84 11386/85 N/A GBR 11/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1129JUD001120984https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57450
CASE OF BRUALLA GÓMEZ DE LA TORRE v. SPAIN
CASE OF BRUALLA G MEZ DE LA TORRE v. SPAIN 26737/95 ESP 12/19/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Transitional provision no. 2 of Law no. 10/92 of 30 April 1992 which ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1219JUD002673795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58127
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20348/92 N/A GBR 9/25/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 sections 77 78 and 80 Circular 28 77 Department of the Environment of 25 March 1977 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0925JUD002034892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58076