Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
CASE OF AL-KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 26766/05 22228/06 BURCOMBE A. WELLS D. BENNATHAN J. FISHER M. TROWLER R. GBR 12/15/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d Non pecuniary damage award Criminal justice ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1215JUD002676605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108072
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
Cayzer v. Australia
Cayzer v. Australia CCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017 Communication number s : 2981/2017 Author: Graham Cayzer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2016 Date of decision 25 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3676/en-US
Cubrilov et al. v. Serbia
Cubrilov et al. v. Serbia CAT/C/72/D/939/2019 Communication number s : 939/2019 Author: Jasmina Cubrilov Jovic Milunka Cubrilov and Marina Cubrilov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Serbia Submission date 23 May 2016 Date of JUTBCAT/C/72/D/939/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3344/en-US
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia CRPD/C/24/D/20/2014 Communication number s : 20/2014 Author: Grainne Sherlock Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Australia Submission date 24 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/24/D/20/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3069/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/505/2012 Communication number s : 505/2012 Author: P.S.B. and T.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 08 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/55/D/505/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1968/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW - POLAND
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW POLAND A/HRC/52/15 NULL 2022 12 13T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/52/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2023 Original: English Human Rights Council Fifty second session 27 February UHRIA/HRC/52/15https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e8b25c51-78ef-447e-b7e8-f275277893d7
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Guatemala
United Nations A/HRC/37/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 2 January 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty seventh session 26 February 23 March 2018 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/37/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-guatemala
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Guatemala
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Guatemala A/HRC/37/9 NULL 2018 01 02T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/37/9 Distr.: General 2 January 2018 General Assembly Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty seventh session 26 UHRIA/HRC/37/9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4a010aaa-5ad4-44de-bc53-277c84a1f424
Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health
Report to HRC A/HRC/38/36/Add.1 from 22 March 2017 to 3 April 2017 5 April 2018 Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health Indonesia United Nations A/HRC/38/36/Add.1 UNSPA/HRC/38/36/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f38%2f36%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US