Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 761 - 780 of 811
Sylvie Bakatu-Bia v. Sweden
Sylvie Bakatu Bia v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/379/2009 Communication number s : 379/2009 Author: Sylvie Bakatu Bia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 03 Jun 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/46/D/379/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1792/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.B. v. Switzerland
T.B. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/862/2018 Communication number s : 862/2018 Author: T.B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2018 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/862/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3139/en-US
T.K.T. v. Switzerland
T.K.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/866/2018 Communication number s : 866/2018 Author: T.K.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/866/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3373/en-US
T.S. v. Netherlands
T.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/896/2018 Communication number s : 896/2018 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Nov 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/896/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3374/en-US
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/43/D/403/1990 Communication number s : 403/1990 Author: T.W.M.B. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Apr 1990 Date of decision 07 Nov 1991 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/403/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/606/en-US
Taito Fa’afete v. New Zealand
Taito Fa afete v. New Zealand CCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009 Communication number s : 1909/2009 Author: Tony Ellis counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country New Zealand Submission date 12 May 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1983/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on the Netherlands ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” *** ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on the Netherlands Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding NLD 2010 06 11 2010 07 23 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 11 June GRECOGreco-RC-III-2010-5E-Final-Netherlands-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2010-5E-Final-Netherlands-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Armenia on Transparency of party funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Armenia on Transparency of party funding Theme II ARM 2010 12 03 2011 04 11 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate Of Monitoring Strasbourg 3 December 2010 Public Greco Eval III Rep GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-4E-Final-Armenia-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-4E-Final-Armenia-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Lithuania on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Lithuania on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II LTU 2009 07 02 2010 02 17 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 2 July 2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2008 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-10E-Final-Lithuania-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-10E-Final-Lithuania-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Netherlands on ”Transparency of Party Funding” (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Netherlands on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II NLD 2008 06 13 2008 09 10 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 13 June 2008 Public Greco Eval III GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-8E-Final-Netherlands-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2007-8E-Final-Netherlands-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian Federation Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian Federation Transparency of Party Funding Theme II RUS 2012 03 23 2012 08 13 Strasbourg 22 March 2012 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2011 6E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-6E-Final-RussianFed-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-6E-Final-RussianFed-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Interim Compliance Report on Portugal ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” *** ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Interim Compliance Report on Portugal Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding PRT 2013 10 18 2013 10 24 Adoption : 18 October 2013 Public Publication : 24 October 2013 Greco RC III 2013 18E Interim Report GRECOGreco-RC-III-2013-18E-Final-Interim-Portugal-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2013-18E-Final-Interim-Portugal-PUBLIC
Third Opinion on Germany
Third Opinion on Germany DEU ACFC/OP/III 2010 003 2010 05 27 Strasbourg 6 December 2010 Public ACFC/OP/III 2010 003 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Germany adopted on 27 May 2010 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2010)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Germany_en
Third Opinion on the Netherlands
Third Opinion on the Netherlands NLD ACFC/OP/III 2019 003 2019 03 06 2019 09 05 ACFC/OP/III 2019 003 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Netherlands 1 Adopted on 6 March 2019 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2019)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Netherlands_en
Thirtheenth Activity Report (2020-2022)
Thirtheenth Activity Report 2020 2022 ACFC/DOC/ 2022 8 add 2022 05 19 2022 09 27 Restricted ACFC/DOC/ 2022 8 add 31 May 2022 13th Activity Report of the ACFC 1 June 2020 31 May 2022 Text as adopted at the 75th Plenary on 19 May 2022 Foreword by the FCNMACFC/DOC/(2022)8_addhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=13th_Activity_Report_2020_2022
Tillman v. Australia
Tillman v. Australia CCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007 Communication number s : 1635/2007 Author: Kenneth Davidson Tillman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Australia Submission date 09 Oct 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1576/en-US
Timmerman v. Netherlands
Timmerman v. Netherlands CCPR/C/67/D/871/1999 Communication number s : 871/1999 Author: Joukje E. Timmerman Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Sep 1998 Date of decision 29 Oct 1999 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/871/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/846/en-US
Trujillo Calero v. Ecuador
Trujillo Calero v. Ecuador E/C.12/63/D/10/2015 Communication number s : 010/2015 Author: Marcia Cecilia Trujillo Calero Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Ecuador Submission date 17 May 2015 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/63/D/10/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2409/en-US
UPR Philippines
UPR Philippines A/HRC/36/12 NULL 2017 07 18T00:00:00 UPR 133.1 Ratify all conventions to which the country is not yet a party Gabon 133.2 Ratify and implement without delay the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced UHRIA/HRC/36/12https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/74e7f944-cc08-4db9-93e8-209dd96b01e9