Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1801 - 1820 of 1999
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT MONTENEGRO
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT MONTENEGRO MNE 2015 06 19 2015 08 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-6E-Final-Montenegro-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-6E-Final-Montenegro-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY NOR 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SPAIN
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SPAIN ESP 2013 12 06 2014 01 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-5E-Final-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-5E-Final-Spain-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT TURKEY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT TURKEY TUR 2015 10 16 2016 03 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-3E-Final-Turkey-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-3E-Final-Turkey-PUBLIC
Faurisson v. France
Faurisson v. France CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993 Communication number s : 550/1993 Author: Robert Faurisson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country France Submission date 02 Jan 1993 Date of decision 08 Nov 1996 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/550/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/654/en-US
Fedotova v. Russian Federation
Fedotova v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/106/D/1932/2010 Communication number s : 1932/2010 Author: Irina Fedotova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Russian Federation Submission date 10 Feb 2010 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1932/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1272/en-US
Fifth General Report on GRETA's activities covering the period from 1 October 2014 to 31 December 2015
Fifth General Report on GRETA s activities covering the period from 1 October 2014 to 31 December 2015 2016 03 16 G R E T A Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA 2016 1 Fifth General Report on GRETA s activities covering the GRETAGEN--2016-1-ENGhttps://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=GEN--2016-1-ENG
Follow-up report v. Finland,Spain,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Finland Spain Switzerland CRC/C/90/2 Communication number s : 26/2017 28/2017 38/2017 40/2018 51/2018 56/2018 63/2018 76/2019 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 90 Country Finland Spain Switzerland Submission date JUTBCRC/C/90/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3560/en-US
G.B. v. Latvia
G.B. v. Latvia CCPR/C/133/D/3124/2018 Communication number s : 3124/2018 Author: G.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 133 Country Latvia Submission date 12 Oct 2017 Date of decision 05 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3124/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3153/en-US
G.E. v. Australia
G.E. v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/725/2016 Communication number s : 725/2016 Author: G.E. represented by D.N. counsellor/social worker at Companion House Assisting Survivors of Torture and Trauma Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/725/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2282/en-US
G.I. v. Denmark
G.I. v. Denmark CAT/C/61/D/625/2014 Communication number s : 625/2014 Author: G.I. represented by counsel Niels Erik Hansen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 10 Aug 2017 JUTBCAT/C/61/D/625/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2281/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
González Cruz v. Spain
Gonz lez Cruz v. Spain CCPR/C/88/D/1151/2003 Communication number s : 1151/2003 Author: Estela Josefina Gonz lez Cruz Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Spain Submission date 25 May 2001 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1151/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1312/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Greece
Government comments on the fourth report on Greece GRC 2009 04 02 2009 09 15 Government comments on the report on GREECE APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Greece ECRI ECRIGRC-COM-IV-2009-031-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GRC-COM-IV-2009-031-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal CAT/C/36/D/181/2001 Communication number s : 181/2001 Author: Suleymane Guengueng et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Senegal Submission date 18 Apr 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2006 Comment: In JUTBCAT/C/36/D/181/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/116/en-US
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands CAT/C/63/D/719/2015 Communication number s : 719/2015 Author: H.A. and G.H. represented by counsel P.J. Schuller Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/719/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2745/en-US
H.A. v. Sweden
H.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/63/D/744/2016 Communication number s : 744/2016 Author: H.A. represented by counsel Viktoria Nystr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Apr 2016 Date of decision 11 May 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/63/D/744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2737/en-US
H.S. v. Australia
H.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010 Communication number s : 2015/2010 Author: H.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 30 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1925/en-US