Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 321 - 340 of 991
Fourth Opinion on Kosovo*
Fourth Opinion on Kosovo SRBKOS ACFC/OP/IV 2017 001 2017 03 08 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2017 001 Fourth Opinion on Kosovo adopted on 8 March 2017 Summary Moderate progress has been FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Kosovo_en
Fuad Jahani v. Switzerland
Fuad Jahani v. Switzerland CAT/C/46/D/357/2008 Communication number s : 357/2008 Author: Fuad Jahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Oct 2008 Date of decision 23 May 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/46/D/357/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/53/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - GERMANY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention GERMANY DEU a22 a57 aco GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon
Gorji Dinka v. Cameroon CCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002 Communication number s : 1134/2002 Author: Fongum Gorji Dinka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Cameroon Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 17 Mar 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1174/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Greece
Government comments on the fourth report on Greece GRC 2009 04 02 2009 09 15 Government comments on the report on GREECE APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Greece ECRI ECRIGRC-COM-IV-2009-031-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GRC-COM-IV-2009-031-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway NOR 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on NORWAY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway ECRI ECRINOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands CAT/C/63/D/719/2015 Communication number s : 719/2015 Author: H.A. and G.H. represented by counsel P.J. Schuller Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/719/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2745/en-US
H.J.T. v. Netherlands
H.J.T. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/133/D/3004/2017 Communication number s : 3004/2017 Author: H.J.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 133 Country Netherlands Submission date 03 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Nov 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3004/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3151/en-US
H.K. v. Switzerland
H.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/49/D/432/2010 Communication number s : 432/2010 Author: H.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Switzerland Submission date 01 Sep 2010 Date of decision 23 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/432/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/15/en-US
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
H.Y. v. Switzerland
H.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/61/D/747/2016 Communication number s : 747/2016 Author: H.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 May 2016 Date of decision 09 Aug 2017 Comment: Decision of violation JUTBCAT/C/61/D/747/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2279/en-US
H. v. Sweden
H. v. Sweden CAT/C/58/D/627/2014 Communication number s : 627/2014 Author: H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Aug 2014 Date of decision 05 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/627/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3012/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bahrain, Ecuador and Tunisia
Human Rights CouncilMORNING AND MIDDAY 19 September 2012Concludes Interactive Dialogue with Human Rights Council Advisory Committee and Starts Debate on Human Rights Bodies and MechanismsThe Human Rights Council today adopted the outcome of the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bahrain
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and-herzegovina
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Lithuania, Uganda and Timor-Leste
Human Rights Council MORNING 16 March 2012The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Lithuania Uganda and Timor Leste.Arturas Gailiunas Charg d Affaires a.i. Minister Counsellor of the Permanent Mission UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-lithuania