Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 221
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A.P. v. Finland
A.P. v. Finland CAT/C/60/D/465/2011 Communication number s : 465/2011 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Finland Submission date 14 Apr 2011 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/465/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3432/en-US
Adamovich v. Belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015 Communication number s : 2619/2015 Author: Marina Adamovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3156/en-US
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012 Communication number s : 2212/2012 Author: Andrei Sannikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Jul 2012 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2488/en-US
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/112/D/2137/2012 Communication number s : 2137/2012 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 30 Jun 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2137/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1935/en-US
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/126/D/2311/2013 Communication number s : 2311/2013 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 30 May 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2311/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2902/en-US
Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay
C ceres et al. v. Paraguay CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 Communication number s : 2751/2016 Author: Norma Portillo C ceres on her own behalf and that of her deceased brother Rub n Portillo C ceres Hermenegilda C ceres Isabel Bord n Ram rez on her own behalf and JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2784/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA 57864/17 79087/17 55353/19 BAKHTADZE K. LEACH P. REMEZAITE R. GAVRON J. SAWYER J. CLIFFORD J. JOMARJIDZE N. ONIANI T. TABATADZE G. COJOCARIU C. LEVINE K. EVANS J. GEO 12/1/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD005786417https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-221237
CASE OF ŞAHİN ALPAY v. TURKEY
CASE OF AH N ALPAY v. TURKEY 16538/17 CAGIL F. TUR 3/20/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0320JUD001653817https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181866
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF AHMET H SREV ALTAN v. TURKEY 13252/17 ALBUGA ALIKU U F. TUR 4/13/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0413JUD001325217https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209444
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 18465/91 N/A GBR 5/5/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 sections 139 1 and 5 141 1 142 152 Schedule 3 paras. 6 7 and 16 1952 Act on customs 1876 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0505JUD001846591https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57939
CASE OF AKOPYAN v. UKRAINE
CASE OF AKOPYAN v. UKRAINE 12317/06 MARYANOVSKIY G.A. UKR 6/5/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0605JUD001231706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144358
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685