Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 941 - 959 of 959
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Liberia Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/LBR/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Liberia UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/LBR/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-liberia-report-office-united-nations
T.Z. v. Switzerland
T.Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/688/2015 Communication number s : 688/2015 Author: T.Z. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 07 Jul 2015 Date of decision 22 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/688/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2334/en-US
Taito Fa’afete v. New Zealand
Taito Fa afete v. New Zealand CCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009 Communication number s : 1909/2009 Author: Tony Ellis counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country New Zealand Submission date 12 May 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1909/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1983/en-US
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
Third Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition (CETS No. 209)
Third Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition CETS No. 209 209 Strasbourg 2010 11 10T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe which are Parties to or which have signed the treaty ETS 24 and for COECETS No. 209https://rm.coe.int/168008482c
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Lithuania on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Lithuania on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II LTU 2009 07 02 2010 02 17 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 2 July 2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2008 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-10E-Final-Lithuania-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-10E-Final-Lithuania-PF-PUBLIC
Third Opinion on the Netherlands
Third Opinion on the Netherlands NLD ACFC/OP/III 2019 003 2019 03 06 2019 09 05 ACFC/OP/III 2019 003 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Netherlands 1 Adopted on 6 March 2019 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2019)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Netherlands_en
Timmerman v. Netherlands
Timmerman v. Netherlands CCPR/C/67/D/871/1999 Communication number s : 871/1999 Author: Joukje E. Timmerman Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Sep 1998 Date of decision 29 Oct 1999 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/871/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/846/en-US
U.M.H. v. Sweden
U.M.H. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016 Communication number s : 2742/2016 Author: U.M.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2845/en-US
Vlcek v. Czech Republic
Vlcek v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/93/D/1485/2006 Communication number s : 1485/2006 Author: Zdenek Vlcek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Czech Republic Submission date 21 Mar 2006 Date of decision 10 Jul 2008 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1485/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1422/en-US
W.E.O. v. Sweden
W.E.O. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016 Communication number s : 2741/2016 Author: W.E.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2844/en-US
Wallmann et al. v. Austria
Wallmann et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/80/D/1002/2001 Communication number s : 1002/2001 Author: Franz Wallmann Rusella Wallmann Hotel zum Hirschen Josef Wallmann Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Austria Submission date 02 Feb 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1002/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1101/en-US
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014 Communication number s : 2360/2014 Author: Warda Osman Jasin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Mar 2014 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2022/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X. v. Switzerland
X. v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/470/2011 Communication number s : 470/2011 Author: X. represented by counsel Monique Bremi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Jul 2011 Date of decision 24 Nov 2014 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/470/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2040/en-US
Y.C. v. Denmark
Y.C. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/59/2013 Communication number s : 059/2013 Author: Y.C. represented by counsel City Advokaterne Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 16 Jan 2013 Date of decision 24 Oct 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/59/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1882/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US