Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1361 - 1380 of 1746
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
H.A. v. Sweden
H.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/63/D/744/2016 Communication number s : 744/2016 Author: H.A. represented by counsel Viktoria Nystr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Apr 2016 Date of decision 11 May 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/63/D/744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2737/en-US
H.S. v. Australia
H.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010 Communication number s : 2015/2010 Author: H.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 30 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1925/en-US
H.Y. v. Switzerland
H.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/61/D/747/2016 Communication number s : 747/2016 Author: H.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 May 2016 Date of decision 09 Aug 2017 Comment: Decision of violation JUTBCAT/C/61/D/747/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2279/en-US
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands NLD 03/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the Court of Appeal s refusal to consider measures that would have enabled the applicant who was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47531
HOLDER v. the Netherlands
HOLDER v. the Netherlands NLD 05/06/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the authorities failure to inform the accused on the date of his hearing. Article 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4481
HUTTEN v. the Netherlands
HUTTEN v. the Netherlands NLD 26/10/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of compensation proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4529
Hamadie Al-Gertani v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Hamadie Al Gertani v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/109/D/1955/2010 Communication number s : 1955/2010 Author: Zeyad Khalaf Hamadie Al Gertani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 04 Jun 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1955/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1690/en-US
Hermosilla Barrio v. Spain
Hermosilla Barrio v. Spain CCPR/C/136/D/3102/2018 Communication number s : 3102/2018 Author: Jes s Mar a Hermosilla Barrio Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country Spain Submission date 25 Jul 2017 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3102/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3762/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Lithuania, Uganda and Timor-Leste
Human Rights Council MORNING 16 March 2012The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Lithuania Uganda and Timor Leste.Arturas Gailiunas Charg d Affaires a.i. Minister Counsellor of the Permanent Mission UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-lithuania
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Niger, Mozambique and Estonia
Human Rights Council MORNING 9 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Niger Mozambique and Estonia. Abdoulaye Djibor Minister of Justice and Human Rights of Niger said Niger had received UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-niger
Independent Expert on human rights in Chad
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/121 from 7 October 2004 to 17 October 2004 27 January 2005 Independent Expert on human rights in Chad Chad UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2005/121 27 January 2005 ENGLISH Original: FRENCH UNSPE/CN.4/2005/121https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f121&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/46/Add.1 from 27 July 2005 to 29 July 2005 27 March 2006 Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights Mozambique UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social UNSPE/CN.4/2006/46/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f46%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the human rights situation in Afghanistan
Report to HRC A/55/346 February 2002 30 August 2000 Independent Expert on the human rights situation in Afghanistan Iran Islamic Republic of United Nations A/55/346 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 August 2000 Original: English Fifty fifth session Item UNSPA/55/346https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2f55%2f346&Lang=en
Ismagulova and Taukina v. Kazakhstan
Ismagulova and Taukina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2664/2015 Communication number s : 2664/2015 Author: Aliya Ismagulova and Rozlana Taukina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 25 May 2015 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2664/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3290/en-US
J.B. v. Canada
J.B. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/529/2012 Communication number s : 529/2012 Author: J.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Nov 2012 Date of decision 06 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/529/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3005/en-US
J.D. v. Switzerland
J.D. v. Switzerland CAT/C/70/D/819/2017 Communication number s : 819/2017 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Switzerland Submission date 30 Mar 2017 Date of decision 30 Dec 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/70/D/819/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3422/en-US
J.M. v. Canada
J.M. v. Canada CAT/C/60/D/699/2015 Communication number s : 699/2015 Author: J.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Canada Submission date 09 Sep 2015 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/60/D/699/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3426/en-US
JALOUD v. the Netherlands
JALOUD v. the Netherlands NLD 20/11/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:15:35 Case Description: Right to life. Actions of security forces in Iraq: Ineffectiveness of investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death in Iraq of the applicant s son an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5952