Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1401 - 1420 of 1746
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
M v. the Netherlands
M v. the Netherlands NLD 25/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the General Intelligence and Security Service s decisive control over the evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48095
MAASSEN v. the Netherlands
MAASSEN v. the Netherlands NLD 09/05/2021 00:00:00 02/07/2021 16:22:27 Case Description: These cases concern the domestic courts insufficiently reasoned decisions 2014 2017 regarding the applicants continued pre trial detention violations of Article 5 3 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58021
MARPA ZEELAND B.V. ET METAL WELDING SERVICE B.V. v. the Netherlands
MARPA ZEELAND B.V. ET METAL WELDING SERVICE B.V. v. the Netherlands NLD 09/02/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to an appellate court for the applicant companies which were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4505
MATHEW v. the Netherlands
MATHEW v. the Netherlands NLD 15/02/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of righs in detention: Inhuman treatment due to the keeping for an excessive and unnecessarily protracted period in solitary confinement in the Aruba EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4547
MENCKEBERG v. the Netherlands
MENCKEBERG v. the Netherlands NLD 22/02/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Appeal Court resulting in the applicant s conviction to a four months prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4451
MEULENDIJKS v. the Netherlands
MEULENDIJKS v. the Netherlands NLD 14/08/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before administrative bodies and tribunals. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4485
MORSINK v. the Netherlands
MORSINK v. the Netherlands NLD 10/11/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Excessive length of pre placement detention of mentally ill offenders in ordinary remand centres while awaiting a place in a custodial clinic: mentally ill offenders EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4511
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium BEL 10/07/2020 00:00:00 29/07/2020 17:07:09 Case Description: The Mugemangango case concerns the absence of a procedure offering adequate and sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure effective examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55685
MURRAY v. the Netherlands
MURRAY v. the Netherlands NLD 26/04/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:15:35 Case Description: Inhuman and/or degrading treatment on account of the de facto irreducibility of life sentence imposed on the applicant who suffered from a mental illness and was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5944
Masih Shakeel v. Canada
Masih Shakeel v. Canada CCPR/C/108/D/1881/2009 Communication number s : 1881/2009 Author: Masih Shakeel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 24 Jul 2013 Comment: The texts of two JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1881/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1670/en-US
Meïssa Wade v. Senegal
Me ssa Wade v. Senegal CCPR/C/124/D/2783/2016 Communication number s : 2783/2016 Author: Karim Me ssa Wade Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Senegal Submission date 31 May 2016 Date of decision 23 Oct 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2783/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3325/en-US
Munaf v. Iraq,Romania
Munaf v. Iraq Romania CCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006 Communication number s : 1539/2006 Author: Mohammad Munaf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Iraq Romania Submission date 13 Dec 2006 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1517/en-US
NAKACH v. the Netherlands
NAKACH v. the Netherlands NLD 30/09/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure by the court of appeal to draw up formal records of hearings concerning the extension of detention in a secure institution EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4537
NETHERLANDS : RECOMMENDATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY
NETHERLANDS : RECOMMENDATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/NLD/1 NULL 2016 11 02T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/NLD/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 3 November 2016 and Other Cruel Inhuman UHRICAT/OP/NLD/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/83cd455a-c481-4d60-9b46-f0df076a28bc
NORWAY: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NORWAY: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/NOR/CO/8 NULL 2018 06 05T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/NOR/CO/8 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 5 June 2018 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/NOR/CO/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/914543c2-b922-45ae-a919-c4e8c539633e
Novotny v. Czech Republic
Novotny v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/98/D/1778/2008 Communication number s : 1778/2008 Author: Jaroslav Novotny Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Mar 2008 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1778/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1579/en-US
O.O.J v. Sweden
O.O.J v. Sweden CRPD/C/18/D/28/2015 Communication number s : 028/2015 Author: O.O.J Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 18 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Mar 2015 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/28/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2328/en-US
OZCELIK v. the Netherlands
OZCELIK v. the Netherlands NLD 28/07/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:03:03 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Excessive length of the proceedings by which the applicant s appeal against the rejection for his request for release from a Persistent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4371
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the implementation of the universal periodic review - Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/41/29 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 May 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty first session 24 June 12 July 2019 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports UPRA/HRC/41/29https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance-implementation