Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1721 - 1740 of 1746
VENEMA v. the Netherlands
VENEMA v. the Netherlands NLD 17/03/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unjustified failure to allow parents to participate in the decision making process having led to a provisional placement of their daughter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4375
VERAART v. the Netherlands
VERAART v. the Netherlands NLD 28/02/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to admonition of a lawyer by the Bar Association s Disciplinary Appeal Tribunal based on an inadequate assessment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4553
VIDGEN v. the Netherlands
VIDGEN v. the Netherlands NLD 10/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:15:35 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s conviction on the sole basis of the statements of his co accused EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5932
VISIT TO FRANCE :REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, JOSEPH A. CANNATACI
VISIT TO FRANCE :REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY JOSEPH A. CANNATACI A/HRC/46/37/ADD.2 NULL 2021 02 01T00:00:00 SR Privacy United Nations A/HRC/46/37/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 February 2021 Original: English Human UHRIA/HRC/46/37/ADD.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8f94a9dc-4ccc-42aa-bfef-372e44338371
VISSER v. the Netherlands
VISSER v. the Netherlands NLD 14/02/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial resulting in a conviction based on decisive extent on the use of an anonymous witness statement as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4461
VOSKUIL v. the Netherlands
VOSKUIL v. the Netherlands NLD 22/02/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:15:35 Case Description: Protection of private life / Freedom of information / freedom of expression: Detention of a journalist as a measure aiming at disclosure of his journalistic sources EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5930
Vicente et al. v. Colombia
Vicente et al. v. Colombia CCPR/C/60/D/612/1995 Communication number s : 612/1995 Author: Jos Vicente and Amado Villafa e Chaparro Dioselina Torres Crespo Hermes Enrique Torres Solis and Vicencio Chaparro Izquierdo Type of decision: Decision on merits JUTBCCPR/C/60/D/612/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/873/en-US
WESSELS-BERGERVOET v. the Netherlands
WESSELS BERGERVOET v. the Netherlands NLD 04/09/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of property and discrimination on the ground of gender: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant due to a reduction of her old age pension EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4483
WOKKE v. the Netherlands
WOKKE v. the Netherlands NLD 31/10/1998 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4467
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC A/HRC/16/47/Add.2 from 7 June 2010 to 18 June 2010 8 February 2011 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Malaysia United Nations A/HRC/16/47/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 8 February 2011 Original: English Human Rights Council UNSPA/HRC/16/47/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f16%2f47%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 from 27 June 2014 to 30 June 2014 10 September 2018 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Montenegro United Nations A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 September 2018 English only Human UNSPA/HRC/39/46/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f39%2f46%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X and Z v. Finland
X and Z v. Finland CAT/C/52/D/485/2011 Communication number s : 483/2011 485/2011 Author: Mr. X and Mr. Z both represented by Marjaana Laine of the Refugee Advice Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Finland Submission date 14 JUTBCAT/C/52/D/485/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3225/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X. v. Switzerland
X. v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/470/2011 Communication number s : 470/2011 Author: X. represented by counsel Monique Bremi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Jul 2011 Date of decision 24 Nov 2014 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/470/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2040/en-US
Y.B.F., S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland
Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/467/2011 Communication number s : 467/2011 Author: Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 31 May 2013 JUTBCAT/C/50/D/467/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US
Y. v. Switzerland
Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/431/2010 Communication number s : 431/2010 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 31 Aug 2010 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/50/D/431/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/10/en-US
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US