Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 801 - 820 of 1058
E. V. I. v. Sweden
E. V. I. v. Sweden CAT/C/38/D/296/2006 Communication number s : 296/2006 Author: E. V. I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Sweden Submission date 02 Jun 2006 Date of decision 01 May 2007 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/38/D/296/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/94/en-US
European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 024)
European Convention on Extradition ETS No. 024 024 Paris 1957 12 13T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Paris 1960 04 18T00:00:00 3 Ratifications. The European Convention on Extradition provides COEETS No. 024https://rm.coe.int/1680064587
European Convention on Nationality (ETS No. 166)
European Convention on Nationality ETS No. 166 166 Strasbourg 1997 11 06T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States Strasbourg COEETS No. 166https://rm.coe.int/168007f2c8
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT LITHUANIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT LITHUANIA LTU 2014 12 12 2015 02 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-5E-Final-Lithuania-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-5E-Final-Lithuania-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT MONTENEGRO
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT MONTENEGRO MNE 2015 06 19 2015 08 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-6E-Final-Montenegro-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-6E-Final-Montenegro-PUBLIC
Faragollah et al. v. Switzerland
Faragollah et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/47/D/381/2009 Communication number s : 381/2009 Author: Abolghasem Faragollah et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 47 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Apr 2009 Date of decision 21 Nov 2011 JUTBCAT/C/47/D/381/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/46/en-US
Fifth Opinion on Spain
Fifth Opinion on Spain ESP ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final 2020 05 27 2020 10 15 ACFC/OP/V 2020 002Final Published on 15 October 2020 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2020)002Finalhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_Op_Spain_EN
First Opinion on the Netherlands
First Opinion on the Netherlands NLD ACFC/OP/I 2009 002 2009 06 25 Strasbourg 17 February 2010 ACFC/OP/I 2009 002 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Opinion on the Netherlands Adopted on 25 June 2009 FCNMACFC/OP/I(2009)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_OP_Netherlands_en
First report on Croatia
First report on Croatia HRV 1998 11 28 1999 11 09 Council of EuropeCRI 99 48 European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance First report on Croatia Adopted on 9 November 1999 For further information about the work of the European Commission against ECRIHRV-CbC-I-1999-048-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=HRV-CbC-I-1999-048-ENG
Follow-up report v. Finland,Spain,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Finland Spain Switzerland CRC/C/90/2 Communication number s : 26/2017 28/2017 38/2017 40/2018 51/2018 56/2018 63/2018 76/2019 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 90 Country Finland Spain Switzerland Submission date JUTBCRC/C/90/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3560/en-US
Fourth Thematic Commentary
Fourth Thematic Commentary ACFC/56DOC 2016 001 2016 05 27 2016 05 27 The Framework Convention: a key tool to managing diversity through minority rights Thematic commentary No. 4 The scope of application of the Framework Convention for the Protection of FCNMACFC/56DOC(2016)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=Fourth_Thematic_Commentary_EN
G.B.M. v. Sweden
G.B.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/435/2010 Communication number s : 435/2010 Author: G.B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 05 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/435/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/16/en-US
Gert Jan Timmer v. Netherlands
Gert Jan Timmer v. Netherlands CCPR/C/111/D/2097/2011 Communication number s : 2097/2011 Author: Gert Jan Timmer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Feb 2011 Date of decision 24 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2097/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1869/en-US
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bahrain, Ecuador and Tunisia
Human Rights CouncilMORNING AND MIDDAY 19 September 2012Concludes Interactive Dialogue with Human Rights Council Advisory Committee and Starts Debate on Human Rights Bodies and MechanismsThe Human Rights Council today adopted the outcome of the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bahrain
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Niger, Mozambique and Estonia
Human Rights Council MORNING 9 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Niger Mozambique and Estonia. Abdoulaye Djibor Minister of Justice and Human Rights of Niger said Niger had received UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-niger
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Saint Kitts, and Nevis, Sao Tome and Principe and Namibia
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 8 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Saint Kitts and Nevis Sao Tome and Principe and Namibia. Delano Bart Permanent Representative of Saint Kitts and UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-saint-kitts