Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1521 - 1540 of 1548
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.K.T. v. Switzerland
T.K.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/866/2018 Communication number s : 866/2018 Author: T.K.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/866/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3373/en-US
T.S. v. Netherlands
T.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/896/2018 Communication number s : 896/2018 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Nov 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/896/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3374/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Croatia on Transparency of party funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Croatia on Transparency of party funding Theme II HRV 2009 12 04 2009 12 04 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 4 December 2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-1E-Final-Croatia-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-1E-Final-Croatia-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Lithuania on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Lithuania on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II LTU 2009 07 02 2010 02 17 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 2 July 2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2008 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-10E-Final-Lithuania-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2008-10E-Final-Lithuania-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian Federation Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian Federation Transparency of Party Funding Theme II RUS 2012 03 23 2012 08 13 Strasbourg 22 March 2012 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2011 6E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-6E-Final-RussianFed-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-6E-Final-RussianFed-PF-PUBLIC
Tillman v. Australia
Tillman v. Australia CCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007 Communication number s : 1635/2007 Author: Kenneth Davidson Tillman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Australia Submission date 09 Oct 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1576/en-US
Timur Ilyasov v. Kazakhstan
Timur Ilyasov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/111/D/2009/2010 Communication number s : 2009/2010 Author: Timur Ilyasov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 21 Jul 2010 Date of decision 23 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2009/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1861/en-US
Vivian Maritza Hincapié Dávila v. Colombia
Vivian Maritza Hincapi D vila v. Colombia CCPR/C/122/D/2490/2014/REV.1 Communication number s : 2490/2014 Author: Vivian Maritza Hincapi D vila Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 122 Country Colombia Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2490/2014/REV.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2437/en-US
Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/56/Add.1 from 26 June 2014 to 4 July 2014 20 July 2015 Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent Netherlands United Nations A/HRC/30/56/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 July 2015 Original: English Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/30/56/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f56%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X, Y and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/55/D/530/2012 Communication number s : 530/2012 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Nov 2012 Date of decision 04 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/530/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2073/en-US
X and Y v. Netherlands
X and Y v. Netherlands CAT/C/15/D/31/1995 Communication number s : 031/1995 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 15 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Sep 1995 Date of decision 20 Nov 1995 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/15/D/31/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/224/en-US
X and Z v. Finland
X and Z v. Finland CAT/C/52/D/485/2011 Communication number s : 483/2011 485/2011 Author: Mr. X and Mr. Z both represented by Marjaana Laine of the Refugee Advice Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Finland Submission date 14 JUTBCAT/C/52/D/485/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3225/en-US
X v. Australia,Lebanon
X v. Australia Lebanon CAT/C/42/D/324/2007 Communication number s : 324/2007 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Australia Lebanon Submission date 02 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Apr 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/42/D/324/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/69/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia CCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018 Communication number s : 3254/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Latvia Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3494/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
Y.B.F., S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland
Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/467/2011 Communication number s : 467/2011 Author: Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 31 May 2013 JUTBCAT/C/50/D/467/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3/en-US