Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1441 - 1460 of 1880
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands CAT/C/63/D/719/2015 Communication number s : 719/2015 Author: H.A. and G.H. represented by counsel P.J. Schuller Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/719/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2745/en-US
H.I. et al. v. Netherlands
H.I. et al. v. Netherlands CAT/C/62/D/685/2015 Communication number s : 685/2015 Author: H.I. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Feb 2015 Date of decision 10 Nov 2017 Comment: Non violation JUTBCAT/C/62/D/685/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2399/en-US
H.K. v. Switzerland
H.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/49/D/432/2010 Communication number s : 432/2010 Author: H.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Switzerland Submission date 01 Sep 2010 Date of decision 23 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/432/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/15/en-US
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
H.S. v. Denmark
H.S. v. Denmark CAT/C/71/D/792/2016 Communication number s : 792/2016 Author: H.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Dec 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/792/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3369/en-US
H. v. Sweden
H. v. Sweden CAT/C/58/D/627/2014 Communication number s : 627/2014 Author: H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Aug 2014 Date of decision 05 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/627/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3012/en-US
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands CCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014 Communication number s : 2489/2014 Author: Jamshed Hashemi and Maryam Hashemi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 2013 Date of decision 26 JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3321/en-US
Hosseiny et al. v. Switzerland
Hosseiny et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/812/2017 Communication number s : 812/2017 Author: Namigh Hosseiny Fariba Masroory and Avin Hosseiny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Feb 2017 Date of JUTBCAT/C/71/D/812/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3365/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Lithuania, Uganda and Timor-Leste
Human Rights Council MORNING 16 March 2012The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Lithuania Uganda and Timor Leste.Arturas Gailiunas Charg d Affaires a.i. Minister Counsellor of the Permanent Mission UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-lithuania
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Niger, Mozambique and Estonia
Human Rights Council MORNING 9 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Niger Mozambique and Estonia. Abdoulaye Djibor Minister of Justice and Human Rights of Niger said Niger had received UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-niger
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
Humanitarian Law Center v. Serbia
Humanitarian Law Center v. Serbia CCPR/C/89/D/1355/2005 Communication number s : 1355/2005 Author: Humanitarian Law Center Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Serbia Submission date 23 Dec 2004 Date of decision 26 Mar 2007 JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1355/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1296/en-US
I.A.K. v. Denmark,Iraq
I.A.K. v. Denmark Iraq CCPR/C/118/D/2115/2011 Communication number s : 2115/2011 Author: I.A.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country Denmark Iraq Submission date 01 Jun 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2115/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2241/en-US
Independent Expert on Extreme poverty
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/48 from 11 November 1998 to 14 November 1998 29 January 1999 Independent Expert on Extreme poverty Yemen UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/48 29 January 1999 ENGLISH Original: ENGLISH/FRENCH UNSPE/CN.4/1999/48https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f48&Lang=en
Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity
Report to HRC A/HRC/41/44/Add.2 from 5 November 2018 to 13 November 2018 1 May 2019 Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity Netherlands United Nations A/HRC/41/44/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 May 2019 Original: English UNSPA/HRC/41/44/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f41%2f44%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/46/Add.1 from 27 July 2005 to 29 July 2005 27 March 2006 Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights Mozambique UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social UNSPE/CN.4/2006/46/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f46%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights
Report to HRC A/HRC/20/23/Add.2 from 25 July 2011 to 5 August 2011 11 June 2012 Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights particularly UNSPA/HRC/20/23/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f20%2f23%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/103 from 31 October 1998 to 13 November 1998 18 February 1999 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/103 18 February 1999 UNSPE/CN.4/1999/103https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f103&Lang=en
Interim follow-up Conclusions on the Netherlands - 4th monitoring cycle
Interim follow up Conclusions on the Netherlands 4th monitoring cycle NLD 2016 03 17 2016 06 07 CRI 2016 24 ECRI CONCLUSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN RESPECT OF THE NETHERLANDS SUBJECT TO INTERIM FOLLOW UP Adopted on 17 March 2016 1 ECRINLD-IFU-IV-2016-024-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NLD-IFU-IV-2016-024-ENG
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 Communication number s : 2728/2016 Author: Ioane Teitiota Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Sep 2015 Date of decision 24 Oct 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2798/en-US