Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 581 - 600 of 751
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) Slovenia
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention Slovenia SVN exe 2021 06 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Grenada’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 22 January 2020 Grenada s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 27 January 2020 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Grenada is one of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/01/grenadas-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands CAT/C/63/D/719/2015 Communication number s : 719/2015 Author: H.A. and G.H. represented by counsel P.J. Schuller Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/719/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2745/en-US
H.K v. Australia
H.K v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/701/2015 Communication number s : 701/2015 Author: H.K Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60th session Country Australia Submission date 16 Sep 2015 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: Views violation. JUTBCAT/C/60/D/701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2327/en-US
H. v. Sweden
H. v. Sweden CAT/C/58/D/627/2014 Communication number s : 627/2014 Author: H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Aug 2014 Date of decision 05 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/627/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3012/en-US
Haiti’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 26 January 2022 Haiti s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 31 January 2022 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Haiti is one of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2022/01/haitis-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Halelkhan Adilkhanov v. Kazakhstan
Halelkhan Adilkhanov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/128/D/2686/2015 Communication number s : 2686/2015 Author: Halelkhan Adilkhanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 18 Dec 2013 Date of decision 12 Mar 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2826/en-US
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/103 from 24 August 2003 to 4 September 2003 30 November 2003 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia 70 6 0 6 105 EQPQOKE CPF 5QEKCN Distr. GENERAL QWPEKN E/CN.4/2004/103 30 November 2003 Original: UNSPE/CN.4/2004/103https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f103&Lang=en
India’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
Hindi version PDF GENEVA 4 November 2022 India s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the fourth time on Thursday 10 November 2022 in a meeting that will be webcast live. UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2022/11/indias-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 Communication number s : 2728/2016 Author: Ioane Teitiota Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Sep 2015 Date of decision 24 Oct 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2798/en-US
Ivanov v. Russian Federation
Ivanov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/131/D/2635/2015 Communication number s : 2635/2015 Author: Vladimir Ivanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Russian Federation Submission date 17 Jan 2015 Date of decision 18 Mar 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2635/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3244/en-US
J.B. v. Canada
J.B. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/529/2012 Communication number s : 529/2012 Author: J.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Nov 2012 Date of decision 06 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/529/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3005/en-US
J.L.L. v. Switzerland
J.L.L. v. Switzerland CAT/C/48/D/364/2008 Communication number s : 364/2008 Author: J.L.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Switzerland Submission date 18 Nov 2008 Date of decision 18 May 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/48/D/364/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/32/en-US
J.X.F.P. v. Australia
J.X.F.P. v. Australia CAT/C/75/D/770/2016 Communication number s : 770/2016 Author: J.X.F.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Australia Submission date 26 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/770/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3739/en-US
Jean Baptiste Mugimba v. Netherlands
Jean Baptiste Mugimba v. Netherlands CAT/C/66/D/768/2016 Communication number s : 768/2016 Author: Jean Baptiste Mugimba represented by counsels Bart Stapert Caroline Buisman and Devika Kamp Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country JUTBCAT/C/66/D/768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2578/en-US
Jean Claude Iyamuremye v. Netherlands
Jean Claude Iyamuremye v. Netherlands CAT/C/66/D/771/2016 Communication number s : 771/2016 Author: Jean Claude Iyamuremye represented by counsels Bart Stapert Caroline Buisman and Devika Kamp Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country JUTBCAT/C/66/D/771/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2579/en-US
K.V. v. Australia
K.V. v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/600/2014 Communication number s : 600/2014 Author: K.V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 25 Apr 2014 Date of decision 11 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/600/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2218/en-US
Kell v. Canada
Kell v. Canada CEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008 Communication number s : 019/2008 Author: Cecilia Kell Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jun 2008 Date of decision 28 Feb 2012 Comment: The text of one individual JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1718/en-US
Khaleel v. Maldives
Khaleel v. Maldives CCPR/C/123/D/2785/2016 Communication number s : 2785/2016 Author: Ahmed Khaleel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Maldives Submission date 11 Jul 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2785/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3324/en-US