Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1681 - 1700 of 1706
Third Evaluation Round Interim Compliance Report on Portugal ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” *** ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Interim Compliance Report on Portugal Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding PRT 2013 10 18 2013 10 24 Adoption : 18 October 2013 Public Publication : 24 October 2013 Greco RC III 2013 18E Interim Report GRECOGreco-RC-III-2013-18E-Final-Interim-Portugal-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2013-18E-Final-Interim-Portugal-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on the Netherlands ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on the Netherlands Transparency of Party Funding NLD 2012 06 22 2013 02 06 Adoption: 22 June 2012 Public Publication: 6 February 2013 Greco RC III 2012 9E Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on GRECOGreco-Second-RC-III-2012-9E-Final-Netherlands-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Second-RC-III-2012-9E-Final-Netherlands-PUBLIC
Third General Report on GRETA's activities covering the period from 1 August 2012 to 31 July 2013
Third General Report on GRETA s activities covering the period from 1 August 2012 to 31 July 2013 2013 10 17 G R E T A Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA 2013 17 Third General Report on GRETA s activities covering the GRETAGEN--2013-17-ENGhttps://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=GEN--2013-17-ENG
Third Opinion on the Netherlands
Third Opinion on the Netherlands NLD ACFC/OP/III 2019 003 2019 03 06 2019 09 05 ACFC/OP/III 2019 003 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Netherlands 1 Adopted on 6 March 2019 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2019)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Netherlands_en
V.N.I.M. v. Canada
V.N.I.M. v. Canada CAT/C/29/D/119/1998 Communication number s : 119/1998 Author: V.N.I.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Canada Submission date 03 Nov 1998 Date of decision 12 Nov 2002 Comment: exact date of the admissibility JUTBCAT/C/29/D/119/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/176/en-US
VISIT TO FRANCE :REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, JOSEPH A. CANNATACI
VISIT TO FRANCE :REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY JOSEPH A. CANNATACI A/HRC/46/37/ADD.2 NULL 2021 02 01T00:00:00 SR Privacy United Nations A/HRC/46/37/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 February 2021 Original: English Human UHRIA/HRC/46/37/ADD.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8f94a9dc-4ccc-42aa-bfef-372e44338371
VISIT TO THE NETHERLANDS - REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON CONTEMPORARY FORMS OF RACISM, RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, XENOPHOBIA AND RELATED INTOLERANCE
VISIT TO THE NETHERLANDS REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON CONTEMPORARY FORMS OF RACISM RACIAL DISCRIMINATION XENOPHOBIA AND RELATED INTOLERANCE A/HRC/44/57/ADD.2 NULL 2020 07 02T00:00:00 SR Racism United Nations A/HRC/44/57/Add.2 General Assembly UHRIA/HRC/44/57/ADD.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ff0e5f93-2022-480b-b906-14dfbeacc194
Vicente et al. v. Colombia
Vicente et al. v. Colombia CCPR/C/60/D/612/1995 Communication number s : 612/1995 Author: Jos Vicente and Amado Villafa e Chaparro Dioselina Torres Crespo Hermes Enrique Torres Solis and Vicencio Chaparro Izquierdo Type of decision: Decision on merits JUTBCCPR/C/60/D/612/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/873/en-US
Vos (Hendrika S.) v. Netherlands
Vos Hendrika S. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/218/1986 Communication number s : 218/1986 Author: Hendrika S. Vos Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Dec 1986 Date of decision 29 Mar 1989 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/218/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/540/en-US
Wallmann et al. v. Austria
Wallmann et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/80/D/1002/2001 Communication number s : 1002/2001 Author: Franz Wallmann Rusella Wallmann Hotel zum Hirschen Josef Wallmann Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Austria Submission date 02 Feb 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1002/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1101/en-US
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014 Communication number s : 2360/2014 Author: Warda Osman Jasin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Mar 2014 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2022/en-US
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X and Z v. Finland
X and Z v. Finland CAT/C/52/D/485/2011 Communication number s : 483/2011 485/2011 Author: Mr. X and Mr. Z both represented by Marjaana Laine of the Refugee Advice Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Finland Submission date 14 JUTBCAT/C/52/D/485/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3225/en-US
X et al. v. Slovenia
X et al. v. Slovenia CCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017 Communication number s : 3024/2017 Author: X et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Slovenia Submission date 05 Dec 2013 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3024/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3545/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X. v. Netherlands
X. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1886/2009 Communication number s : 1886/2009 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Oct 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1886/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1279/en-US
X v. Spain
X v. Spain CCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006 Communication number s : 1456/2006 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Spain Submission date 14 Feb 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2008 Comment: The texts of two individual opinions one JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1448/en-US
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015 Communication number s : 2681/2015 Author: Y.A.A. and F.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Nov 2015 Date of decision 10 Mar 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2293/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/88/D/1321 1322/2004 Communication number s : 1322/2004 1321/2004 Author: Yeo Bum Yoon and Myung Jin Choi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 18 Oct 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1323/en-US