Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 641 - 660 of 1520
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/103 from 24 August 2003 to 4 September 2003 30 November 2003 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia 70 6 0 6 105 EQPQOKE CPF 5QEKCN Distr. GENERAL QWPEKN E/CN.4/2004/103 30 November 2003 Original: UNSPE/CN.4/2004/103https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f103&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/103 from 31 October 1998 to 13 November 1998 18 February 1999 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/103 18 February 1999 UNSPE/CN.4/1999/103https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f103&Lang=en
Interim Compliance Report of Fourth Evaluation Round on Turkey
Interim Compliance Report of Fourth Evaluation Round on Turkey TUR 2019 03 22 2019 06 28 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Turkey was adopted at GRECO s 69th Plenary Meeting 16 October 2015 and made public on 17 March 2016 following GRECOGrecoRC4(2019)7-Final-eng-Turkey-Interim-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2019)7-Final-eng-Turkey-Interim-PUBLIC
Interim follow-up Conclusions on the Netherlands - 4th monitoring cycle
Interim follow up Conclusions on the Netherlands 4th monitoring cycle NLD 2016 03 17 2016 06 07 CRI 2016 24 ECRI CONCLUSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN RESPECT OF THE NETHERLANDS SUBJECT TO INTERIM FOLLOW UP Adopted on 17 March 2016 1 ECRINLD-IFU-IV-2016-024-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NLD-IFU-IV-2016-024-ENG
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 Communication number s : 2728/2016 Author: Ioane Teitiota Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Sep 2015 Date of decision 24 Oct 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2798/en-US
Isherwood v. New Zealand
Isherwood v. New Zealand CCPR/C/132/D/2976/2017 Communication number s : 2976/2017 Author: Garri Maui Isherwood Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Feb 2017 Date of decision 12 Jul 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2976/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3191/en-US
J.B. v. Canada
J.B. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/529/2012 Communication number s : 529/2012 Author: J.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Nov 2012 Date of decision 06 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/529/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3005/en-US
J.B. v. Switzerland
J.B. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/721/2015 Communication number s : 721/2015 Author: J.B. represented by counsel Boris Wijkstr m and Gabriella Tau Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/721/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2403/en-US
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016 Communication number s : 2743/2016 Author: J.D.P. and K.E.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2846/en-US
J.R.R. and L.A.A. v. Denmark
J.R.R. and L.A.A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/132/D/2787/2016 Communication number s : 2787/2016 Author: J.R.R. and L.A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Jul 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: Joint JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2787/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3183/en-US
J.S.K.N. v. Denmark
J.S.K.N. v. Denmark CCPR/C/136/D/2754/2016 Communication number s : 2754/2016 Author: J.S.K.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Mar 2016 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: Individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3543/en-US
J.X.F.P. v. Australia
J.X.F.P. v. Australia CAT/C/75/D/770/2016 Communication number s : 770/2016 Author: J.X.F.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Australia Submission date 26 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/770/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3739/en-US
K.K. v. Switzerland
K.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/31/D/186/2001 Communication number s : 186/2001 Author: K.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Switzerland Submission date 03 Jul 2001 Date of decision 11 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/31/D/186/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/153/en-US
K.S. v. Poland
K.S. v. Poland CEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018 Communication number s : 128/2018 Author: K.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Poland Submission date 11 Apr 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3034/en-US
L.O. v. Canada
L.O. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/95/1997 Communication number s : 095/1997 Author: L.O. name withheld Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 23 Oct 1997 Date of decision 19 May 2000 Comment: Pursuant to rule 108 JUTBCAT/C/24/D/95/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/213/en-US
L.R. et al. v. Slovakia
L.R. et al. v. Slovakia CERD/C/66/D/31/2003 Communication number s : 031/2003 Author: L.R. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Slovakia Submission date 05 Aug 2003 Date of decision 07 Mar 2005 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/66/D/31/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1741/en-US
LORSE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands
LORSE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands NLD 04/05/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Conditions of detention: Detention regime in a maximum security prison EBI including very stringent security measures the combination of which with routine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4525
Laurent Gabre Gabaroum v. France
Laurent Gabre Gabaroum v. France CERD/C/89/D/52/2012 Communication number s : 052/2012 Author: Laurent Gabre Gabaroum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country France Submission date 19 Mar 2012 Date of decision 10 May 2016 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/89/D/52/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2175/en-US
Leo v. Australia
Leo v. Australia CRPD/C/22/D/17/2013 Communication number s : 17/2013 Author: Christopher Leo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 19 Sep 2013 Date of decision 30 Aug 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/17/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3134/en-US
Lindgren et al. v. Sweden
Lindgren et al. v. Sweden CCPR/C/40/D/298/1988 Communication number s : 298/1988 299/1988 Author: G. and L. Lindgren and L. Holm A. and B. Hjord I. Lundquist L. Radko and E. Stahl Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 40 Country Sweden JUTBCCPR/C/40/D/298/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/666/en-US