Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 701 - 720 of 890
Chadzjian v. Netherlands
Chadzjian v. Netherlands CCPR/C/93/D/1494/2006 Communication number s : 1494/2006 Author: A.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Jul 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1494/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1426/en-US
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Germany
Chiara Sacchi et al. v. Germany CRC/C/88/D/107/2019 Communication number s : 107/2019 Author: Chiara Sacchi Catarina Lorenzo Iris Duquesne Raina Ivanova Ridhima Pandey David Ackley III Ranton Anjain Litokne Kabua Deborah Adegbile Carlos Manuel Ayakha JUTBCRC/C/88/D/107/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2955/en-US
Christian Nekvedavičius v. Lithuania
Christian Nekvedavi ius v. Lithuania CCPR/C/121/D/2802/2016 Communication number s : 2802/2016 Author: Christian Nekvedavi ius Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jul 2014 Date of decision 09 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2802/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2364/en-US
Conclusions VIII - United Kingdom - Article 1-2
Conclusions VIII United Kingdom Article 1 2 GBR 01 02 000 31/01/1984 31/01/1984 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 2 Freely undertaken work non discrimination prohibition of forced labour other aspects From the United Kingdom report the committee observed ESCVIII/def/GBR/1/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=VIII/def/GBR/1/2/EN
Conclusions XIV-1 - Pays-Bas Antilles - Article 5
Conclusions XIV 1 Pays Bas Antilles Article 5 NLDANT 05 00 000 30/03/1998 30/03/1998 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee takes note of the information relating to the Nether lands Antilles. Forming trade unions The Committee notes that freedom of ESCXIV-1/def/NLDANT/5//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIV-1/def/NLDANT/5//EN
Conclusions XIV-1 - Pays-Bas - Article 5
Conclusions XIV 1 Pays Bas Article 5 NLD 05 00 000 30/03/1998 30/03/1998 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee has always found that the situation in the Netherlands complies with Article 5. Nevertheless it wishes to receive updated information in the ESCXIV-1/def/NLD/5//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIV-1/def/NLD/5//EN
Conclusions XIV-2 - Netherlands - Article 3 of the 1988 Additional Protocol
Conclusions XIV 2 Netherlands Article 3 of the 1988 Additional Protocol NLD 22 00 000 30/11/1998 30/11/1998 Article 3 of the 1988 Additional Protocol Right of workers to take part in the determination and improvement of working conditions and working ESCXIV-2/def/NLD/22//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIV-2/def/NLD/22//EN
Conclusions XV-1 - Pays-Bas Antilles - Article 5
Conclusions XV 1 Pays Bas Antilles Article 5 NLDANT 05 00 000 31/10/2000 31/10/2000 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report. Forming trade unions The report confirms that the only restrictions on the ESCXV-1/def/NLDANT/5//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XV-1/def/NLDANT/5//EN
Conclusions XV-1 - Pays-Bas - Article 5
Conclusions XV 1 Pays Bas Article 5 NLD 05 00 000 31/10/2000 31/10/2000 Article 5 Right to organise The Committee takes note of the information contained in the Dutch report and its appendices. Forming trade unions The Committee recalls that the right to ESCXV-1/def/NLD/5//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XV-1/def/NLD/5//EN
Crippa et al. v. France
Crippa et al. v. France CCPR/C/85/D/993 995/2001 Communication number s : 995/2001 993/2001 Author: Gabriel Crippa Jean Louis Masson and Marie Joe Zimmermann Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country France Submission date 01 Sep JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/993-995/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1230/en-US
D.A.M. v. Sweden
D.A.M. v. Sweden CCPR/C/128/D/3012/2017 Communication number s : 3012/2017 Author: D.A.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Sweden Submission date 04 Jul 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3012/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2834/en-US
Danning v. Netherlands
Danning v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/180/1984 Communication number s : 180/1984 Author: L.G. Danning Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 1984 Date of decision 09 Apr 1987 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/180/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/537/en-US
Dauphin v. Canada
Dauphin v. Canada CCPR/C/96/D/1792/2008 Communication number s : 1792/2008 Author: John Micha l Dauphin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Canada Submission date 29 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: Under article 92 of JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1792/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1550/en-US
De Groot v. Netherlands
De Groot v. Netherlands CCPR/C/54/D/578/1994 Communication number s : 578/1994 Author: Leonardus Johannes Maria de Groot Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 54 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Apr 1993 Date of decision 14 Jul 1995 JUTBCCPR/C/54/D/578/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/640/en-US
De Vos v. Netherlands
De Vos v. Netherlands CCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003 Communication number s : 1192/2003 Author: M. de Vos Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Netherlands Submission date 06 Aug 2002 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/982/en-US
Decision on the Merits: European Federation of National Organisations working with the Homeless (FEANTSA) v. the Netherlands, Collective Complaint No. 86/2012
Decision on the Merits: European Federation of National Organisations working with the Homeless FEANTSA v. the Netherlands Collective Complaint No. 86/2012 NLD 13 00 000 16 00 000 17 00 163 19 00 000 30 00 163 31 00 163 13 01 000 13 04 000 19 04 000 31 02 ESCcc-86-2012-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-86-2012-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Defence for Children International (DCI ) v. Belgium, Collective Complaint No. 69/2011
Decision on the merits: Defence for Children International DCI v. Belgium Collective Complaint No. 69/2011 BEL 17 01 163 07 10 000 11 00 000 11 01 000 13 00 000 30 00 163 91 00 163 11 02 000 13 01 000 13 02 000 13 03 000 16 00 000 91 140 163 91 154 163 91 ESCcc-69-2011-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-69-2011-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Defence for Children International (DCI) v. The Netherlands, Collective Complaint No.47/2008
Decision on the merits: Defence for Children International DCI v. The Netherlands Collective Complaint No.47/2008 NLD 11 00 000 13 00 000 16 00 000 17 00 163 30 00 163 31 00 163 91 154 163 91 163 163 91 175 163 91 176 163 91 212 163 91 213 163 20/10/2009 ESCcc-47-2008-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-47-2008-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France, complaint No. 114/2015
Decision on the merits: European Committee for Home Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family EUROCEF v. France complaint No. 114/2015 FRA 17 01 163 17 02 163 07 10 000 11 01 000 13 01 000 31 02 163 30 00 163 91 00 163 2018 01 24 2018 06 15 ESCcc-114-2015-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-114-2015-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) v. Czech Republic, Complaint No.148/2017
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists ICJ v. Czech Republic Complaint No.148/2017 CZE 17 00 035 2020 10 20 2021 03 17 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 20 October ESCcc-148-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-148-2017-dmerits-en