Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2901 - 2920 of 3255
Pelit v. Azerbaijan
Pelit v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/38/D/281/2005 Communication number s : 281/2005 Author: Elif Pelit Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 21 Sep 2005 Date of decision 01 May 2007 Comment: Date of admissibility JUTBCAT/C/38/D/281/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/99/en-US
Persan v. Czech Republic
Persan v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1479/2006 Communication number s : 1479/2006 Author: Jaroslav Persan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Apr 2006 Date of decision 24 Mar 2009 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1479/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1490/en-US
Petersen v. Germany
Petersen v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002 Communication number s : 1115/2002 Author: Werner Petersen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 31 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/854/en-US
Petromelidis v. Greece
Petromelidis v. Greece CCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017 Communication number s : 3065/2017 Author: Lazaros Petromelidis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Greece Submission date 31 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3196/en-US
Picq v. France
Picq v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007 Communication number s : 1632/2007 Author: Raymond Jacques Picq Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 28 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1023/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
Preiss v. Czech Republic
Preiss v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/93/D/1497/2006 Communication number s : 1497/2006 Author: Richard Preiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Czech Republic Submission date 22 Mar 2006 Date of decision 17 Jul 2008 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1497/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1369/en-US
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, restructuring the control machinery established thereby (ETS No. 155) (*)
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms restructuring the control machinery established thereby ETS No. 155 155 Strasbourg 1994 05 11T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an COEETS No. 155https://rm.coe.int/168007cda9
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (ETS No. 046)
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto ETS No. 046 046 Strasbourg 1963 09 COEETS No. 046https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 117)
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 117 117 Strasbourg 1984 11 22T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Strasbourg 1988 11 01T00:00:00 7 COEETS No. 117https://rm.coe.int/168007a082
Protocol No. 8 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 118) (*)
Protocol No. 8 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 118 118 Vienna 1985 03 19T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of ETS 5 and is closed to legal acts. Vienna 1990 01 COEETS No. 118https://rm.coe.int/168007a083
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 009)
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 009 009 Paris 1952 03 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Paris 1954 05 18T00:00:00 10 Ratifications. The COEETS No. 009https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
Q.H.L. v. Australia
Q.H.L. v. Australia CCPR/C/107/D/1938/2010 Communication number s : 1938/2010 Author: Q.H.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Australia Submission date 19 Apr 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1938/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1320/en-US
Q. v. Denmark v. Denmark
Q. v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/113/D/2001/2010 Communication number s : 2001/2010 Author: Q. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Jul 2010 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2001/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1923/en-US
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/63/D/27/2002 Communication number s : 027/2002 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Oct 2002 Date of decision 19 Aug 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/63/D/27/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1742/en-US
R.A.A. and Z. M. v. Denmark
R.A.A. and Z. M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2608/2015 Communication number s : 2608/2015 Author: R.A.A. and Z. M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 08 May 2015 Date of decision 28 Oct 2016 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2608/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2181/en-US
R.E.I. v. Netherlands
R.E.I. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017 Communication number s : 3015/2017 Author: R.E.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3546/en-US
R.G. et al. v. Sweden
R.G. et al. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/586/2014 Communication number s : 586/2014 Author: R.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/56/D/586/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2068/en-US
R. K. v. Australia
R. K. v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/609/2014 Communication number s : 609/2014 Author: R. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 06 May 2014 Date of decision 11 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/609/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2122/en-US
R.O. et al. v. Sweden
R.O. et al. v. Sweden CAT/C/59/D/644/2014 Communication number s : 644/2014 Author: R.O. et al. represented by counsel Lena Isaksson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Dec 2014 Date of decision 18 Nov 2016 JUTBCAT/C/59/D/644/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2199/en-US