Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
CASE OF A. v. CROATIA
CASE OF A. v. CROATIA 55164/08 BEZBRADICA S. HRV 10/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage award Protetction against Domestic violence Act Article 215a of the Criminal Code 343 100 464 451 429 310 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD005516408https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101152
CASE OF ALEXANDRU ENACHE v. ROMANIA
CASE OF ALEXANDRU ENACHE v. ROMANIA 16986/12 BARTHA S.D. MIRCIOI N. ROU 10/3/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD001698612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177677
CASE OF BEELER v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BEELER v. SWITZERLAND 78630/12 LUGINB HL J. CHE 10/11/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 14 8 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1011JUD007863012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-220073
CASE OF BUCHS v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BUCHS v. SWITZERLAND 9929/12 PERRET N. CHE 5/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD000992912https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144138
CASE OF ĒCIS v. LATVIA
CASE OF CIS v. LATVIA 12879/09 ALLIKS A. LVA 1/10/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0110JUD001287909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188991
CASE OF DI TRIZIO v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF DI TRIZIO v. SWITZERLAND 7186/09 MENGIS A. CHE 2/2/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202JUD000718609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-160692
CASE OF E.B. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF E.B. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 31913/07 38357/07 48098/07 48777/07 48779/07 GRAUPNER H. AUT 11/7/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD003191307https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-127814
CASE OF EREMIA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CASE OF EREMIA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 3564/11 STRAISTEANU D.I. MDA 5/28/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Procedural aspect Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528JUD000356411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119968
CASE OF HÄMÄLÄINEN v. FINLAND
CASE OF H M L INEN v. FINLAND 37359/09 COJOCARIU C. FIN 7/16/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0716JUD003735909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145768
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 N/A RUS 10/7/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Respondent State to take measures of a general ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100926
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 MOSKALENKO K. LISMAN N GERASIMOVA I. RUS 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109868
CASE OF ORLANDI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF ORLANDI AND OTHERS v. ITALY 26431/12 26742/12 44057/12 60088/12 BILOTTA F. ROTELLI A. MOSCATI M.F. TORINO R. D AMICO M.E. CLARA M. PITEA C. RAGNI C. ITA 12/14/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1214JUD002643112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179547
CASE OF P.B. AND J.S. v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF P.B. AND J.S. v. AUSTRIA 18984/02 UNTERWEGER J. AUT 7/22/2010 12:00:00 AM Violations of Art. 14 8 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Sections 56 6 56 6a and 217 of the Civil Servants Sickness and Accident Insurance Act CSSAIA 343 100 464 354 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0722JUD001898402https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100042
CASE OF PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA 20458/92 N/A AUT 3/27/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 8 Unemployment Benefit Act 1977 section 26 1 Federal law of 12 December 1989 343 100 464 238 451 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0327JUD002045892 CASE OF PETROVIC v. AUSTRIA ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0327JUD002045892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58146
CASE OF RUNKEE AND WHITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF RUNKEE AND WHITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42949/98 RIGHT S. GBR 5/10/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 in connection with non entitlement to a Widow s Pension Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 concerning non entitlement to a Widow s Payment Not ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD004294998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80478
CASE OF TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 24757/18 STICHTING RUSSIAN JUSTICE INITIATIVE NGO ASTREYA RUS 11/23/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123JUD002475718https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213371
CASE OF WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 36042/97 N/A GBR 6/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 in connection with widow s pension Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 or 14 P1 1 in ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0611JUD003604297https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60499
CASE OF X, Y AND Z v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF X Y AND Z v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 21830/93 N/A GBR 4/22/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 Human Fertility and Embryology Act 1990 section 28 3 Children Act 1989 sections 3 4 8 and 12 2 Births and Deaths ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0422JUD002183093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58032
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA 18592/15 43863/15 MARCHEVA D. BORISOV P. BGR 5/11/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD001859215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209866