Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2462
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
3rd General Report on GREVIO’s activities
3rd General Report on GREVIO s activities 2022 06 14 2022 06 14 cyclePhraseHere Publication date: 14/06/2022 3rd GENERAL REPORT ON GREVIO S ACTIVITIES GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence covering the GREVIO3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOChttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOC
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A.B. v. Germany
A.B. v. Germany CAT/C/64/D/727/2016 Communication number s : 727/2016 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Hana Frankova Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Germany Submission date 05 Feb 2016 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 JUTBCAT/C/64/D/727/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2462/en-US
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A.L. v. Italy
A.L. v. Italy CCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015 Communication number s : 2570/2015 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Italy Submission date 09 Oct 2014 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2894/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Canada
A.S. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/12/D/68/1980 Communication number s : 068/1980 Author: A.S. alleged victims mother and grandmother respectively Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 12 Country Canada Submission date 23 May 1980 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/68/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/509/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems (ETS No. 189)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems ETS No. 189 189 Strasbourg 2003 01 28T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the States which COEETS No. 189https://rm.coe.int/168008160f
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Information on Foreign Law (ETS No. 097)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Information on Foreign Law ETS No. 097 097 Strasbourg 1978 03 15T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 62 and for accession by the non member States which have COEETS No. 097https://rm.coe.int/1680077973
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012 Communication number s : 2201/2012 Author: Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 23 Feb 2012 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2439/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Anatoly Poplavny v. Belarus
Anatoly Poplavny v. Belarus CCPR/C/115/D/2019/2010 Communication number s : 2019/2010 Author: Anatoly Poplavny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Belarus Submission date 23 May 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2019/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2030/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BELLER v. Poland
BELLER v. Poland POL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and bodies violations of Article 6 1 . The case of Wcis o and Cabaj also concerns EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17662
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US