Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
E. B. v. New Zealand
E. B. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005 Communication number s : 1368/2005 Author: E. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Dec 2004 Date of decision 16 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1333/en-US
I.K. v. Norway
I.K. v. Norway CAT/C/63/D/678/2015 Communication number s : 678/2015 Author: I.K. represented by counsel Knut Rognlien Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Norway Submission date 10 Sep 2013 Date of decision 16 May 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/63/D/678/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2738/en-US
Munaf v. Iraq,Romania
Munaf v. Iraq Romania CCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006 Communication number s : 1539/2006 Author: Mohammad Munaf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Iraq Romania Submission date 13 Dec 2006 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1517/en-US
Tatyana v. Poland
Tatyana v. Poland CCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006 Communication number s : 1517/2006 Author: Tatyana Rastorgueva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Poland Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1616/en-US
Vojnovic v. Croatia
Vojnovic v. Croatia CCPR/C/95/D/1510/2006 Communication number s : 1510/2006 Author: Dusan Vojnovic Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Croatia Submission date 23 Jan 2006 Date of decision 30 Mar 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1510/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1488/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US