Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 4259
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A.B. v. Germany
A.B. v. Germany CAT/C/64/D/727/2016 Communication number s : 727/2016 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Hana Frankova Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Germany Submission date 05 Feb 2016 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 JUTBCAT/C/64/D/727/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2462/en-US
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A.L. v. Italy
A.L. v. Italy CCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015 Communication number s : 2570/2015 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Italy Submission date 09 Oct 2014 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2894/en-US
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
APANASEWICZ v. Poland
APANASEWICZ v. Poland POL 03/08/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of private and family life: Excessive length of civil and administrative enforcement proceedings and thus failure of authorities to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20456
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012 Communication number s : 2201/2012 Author: Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 23 Feb 2012 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2439/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Anatoly Poplavny v. Belarus
Anatoly Poplavny v. Belarus CCPR/C/115/D/2019/2010 Communication number s : 2019/2010 Author: Anatoly Poplavny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Belarus Submission date 23 May 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2019/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2030/en-US
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BARANOWSKI PIOTR v. Poland
BARANOWSKI PIOTR v. Poland POL 02/01/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Belated examination of the applicant s appeal against the prolongation of his detention on remand. Article 5 4 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18931
BEDNARZ v. Poland
BEDNARZ v. Poland POL 13/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: Lack of necessary objectivity in and superficial character of the investigation concerning the applicant s alleged ill treatment by police officers in 2013 violation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52328
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BELLER v. Poland
BELLER v. Poland POL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and bodies violations of Article 6 1 . The case of Wcis o and Cabaj also concerns EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17662
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BRUCZYNSKI v. Poland
BRUCZYNSKI v. Poland POL 04/02/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand without relevant and sufficient grounds and lack of enforceable right to compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18557
BUDNIK v. Poland
BUDNIK v. Poland POL 07/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in and conditions of detention: Insufficient compensation awarded by domestic courts for detention in overcrowded conditions and solitary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47703