Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 34
CASE OF AMATO GAUCI v. MALTA
CASE OF AMATO GAUCI v. MALTA 47045/06 COMODINI T. REFALO I. MLT 9/15/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of P1 1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Articles 1494 1505 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915JUD004704506https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-93959
CASE OF ANTHONY AQUILINA v. MALTA
CASE OF ANTHONY AQUILINA v. MALTA 3851/12 ELLIS J. MLT 12/11/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property 369 509 62 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD000385112 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD000385112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148636
CASE OF BÉLA NÉMETH v. HUNGARY
CASE OF B LA N METH v. HUNGARY 73303/14 TAM S O.V. HUN 12/17/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property No violation of Article 14 P1 1 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD007330314https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206514
CASE OF BIMER S.A. v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF BIMER S.A. v. MOLDOVA 15084/03 ZEGLOVS R. MDA 7/10/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Sections 35 36 and 43 of the Law on Foreign Investments 1992 Section 51 of the Customs Code 369 62 321 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710JUD001508403https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81505
CASE OF BITTÓ AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF BITT AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA 30255/09 BRICHTA J. SIMAN M. SVK 1/28/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Respondent ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128JUD003025509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140234
CASE OF BRADSHAW AND OTHERS v. MALTA
CASE OF BRADSHAW AND OTHERS v. MALTA 37121/15 CAMILLERI J. MLT 10/23/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1023JUD003712115https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187200
CASE OF BROSSET-TRIBOULET AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF BROSSET TRIBOULET AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 34078/02 BLONDEL P. FRA 3/29/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Section 1 of the Coastal Areas Act Former Article A 26 of the State Property Code 238 354 369 62 167 509 311 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD003407802https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98036
CASE OF CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALY
CASE OF CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALY 38433/09 PACE A. GRANDINETTI O. MASTROIANNI R. FERRARO F. ITA 6/7/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Six month ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0607JUD003843309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111399
CASE OF EDWARDS v. MALTA
CASE OF EDWARDS v. MALTA 17647/04 REFALO I. MLT 10/24/2006 12:00:00 AM P1 1 applicable Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction partially reserved Housing Act Rent restriction Dwelling Houses Ordinance 14 128 238 354 369 62 321 94 387 311 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024JUD001764704https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77655
CASE OF FU QUAN, S.R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF FU QUAN S.R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 24827/14 STR NSK J. HLAV D. CZE 6/1/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 Four month period former six month Inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art 35 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD002482714https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225209
CASE OF GHIGO v. MALTA
CASE OF GHIGO v. MALTA 31122/05 REFALO I. COMODINI T. lawyers Valetta MLT 9/26/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Damage question reserved Costs and expenses award domestic and Convention proceedings Housing Act sections 2 3 8 and 11 Rent Restriction ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0926JUD003112205https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77001
CASE OF GOGITIDZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
CASE OF GOGITIDZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA 36862/05 KOBAKHIDZE K. GEO 5/12/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0512JUD003686205https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154398
CASE OF HERRMANN v. GERMANY
CASE OF HERRMANN v. GERMANY 9300/07 KLEINE COSACK M. DEU 6/26/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD000930007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111690
CASE OF HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v. POLAND
CASE OF HUTTEN CZAPSKA v. POLAND 35014/97 SOCHANSKI B. POL 2/22/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved Costs and expenses partial award 1974 Housing Act Lease of Dwellings and Housing Allowances Act of 2 July 1994 sections 8 1 9 20 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0222JUD003501497https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68364
CASE OF HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v. POLAND
CASE OF HUTTEN CZAPSKA v. POLAND 35014/97 SOCHANSKI B. POL 6/19/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected ratione temporis Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage reserved Non pecuniary damage financial award Housing Act 1974 Lease of Dwellings and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0619JUD003501497https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75882
CASE OF KÖNYV-TÁR KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
CASE OF K NYV T R KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY 21623/13 K VES P. HUN 10/16/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD002162313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186767
CASE OF KASMI v. ALBANIA
CASE OF KASMI v. ALBANIA 1175/06 DODBIBA S. ALB 6/23/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623JUD000117506https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203153
CASE OF LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 13221/08 2139/10 ELGESEM F. FLAATEN S.O. HIKA G. NOR 6/12/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Respondent ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612JUD001322108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111420
CASE OF MEGADAT.COM SRL v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF MEGADAT.COM SRL v. MOLDOVA 21151/04 HANGANU J. MDA 4/8/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved 238 354 369 62 509 311 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0408JUD002115104 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MEGADAT.COM SRL v. MOLDOVA Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0408JUD002115104https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-85732
CASE OF NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CASE OF NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 28470/12 R ILEANU A. CURUCI Z. B LAN P. MDA 4/5/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD002847012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216872