Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 336
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A/HRC/47/13: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Myanmar
United Nations A/HRC/47/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/13https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4713-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-myanmar
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A/HRC/47/8: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Australia
United Nations A/HRC/47/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/8https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc478-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-australia
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY 15379/16 LUTINA A. NOR 12/10/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life read in the light of Article 9 Art. 9 Freedom of thought conscience and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214433
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 3289/10 EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE UKR 11/6/2018 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106JUD000328910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187508
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE 22689/07 MONGET SARRAIL D. FRA 12/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim Violation of Article 13 8 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 8 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115498
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY 43395/09 CONTICCHIO D. ITA 2/23/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement Violation of Article 6 Right ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0223JUD004339509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-171804
CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 40792/10 30538/14 43439/14 GNEZDILOVA O.A. RUS 1/17/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD004079210https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222750
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS 43494/09 WIJLING R.S. NLD 11/6/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom to choose residence Sections 5 2 6 2 7 1 b and 17 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1106JUD004349409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177406
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA I 13255/07 MESKHORADZE L. RUS 7/3/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD001325507https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145546
CASE OF HASAN AND EYLEM ZENGİN v. TURKEY
CASE OF HASAN AND EYLEM ZENG N v. TURKEY 1448/04 N/A TUR 10/9/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 2 No separate issue under Art. 9 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Article 24 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD000144804https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-82580
CASE OF KURIĆ AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF KURI AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 26828/06 LANA A.G. SACCUCCI A. BALLERINI A VANO M. SVN 7/13/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 Respondent State to take individual measures Respondent State to take measures ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD002682806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99915
CASE OF KURIĆ AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF KURI AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 26828/06 LANA A.G. BALLERINI A. SACCUCCI A. VANO M. SVN 6/26/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Effective domestic remedy Continuing situation Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Ratione temporis ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD002682806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111634
CASE OF M.A. v. CYPRUS
CASE OF M.A. v. CYPRUS 41872/10 CHARALAMBIDOU N. CYP 7/23/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 13 2 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 2 Right to life Expulsion Violation of Article 13 3 Right to an ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD004187210https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122889
CASE OF M.C. AND A.C. v. ROMANIA
CASE OF M.C. AND A.C. v. ROMANIA 12060/12 IONESCU R.I. ROU 4/12/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 3 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 3 Prohibition of torture Effective investigation Positive obligations Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0412JUD001206012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161982
CASE OF MACATĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF MACAT v. LITHUANIA 61435/19 MIZARAS V. WINTEMUTE R. DINGILEVSKIS M. LTU 1/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0123JUD006143519https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222072