Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 76
Conteris v. Uruguay
Conteris v. Uruguay CCPR/C/25/D/139/1983 Communication number s : 139/1983 Author: Ilda Thomas alleged victim s sister Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Uruguay Submission date 16 Mar 1983 Date of decision 17 Jul 1985 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/25/D/139/1983https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/317/en-US
Cridge v. Canada
Cridge v. Canada CCPR/C/95/D/1529/2006 Communication number s : 1529/2006 Author: Josephine Lovey Cridge Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 95 Country Canada Submission date 01 Jun 2006 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1529/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1479/en-US
Ekanayake v. Sri Lanka
Ekanayake v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/88/D/1201/2003 Communication number s : 1201/2003 Author: Hiran Ekanayake Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 10 Apr 2003 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1201/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1259/en-US
Elena Popova v. Russian Federation
Elena Popova v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/122/D/2217/2012 Communication number s : 2217/2012 Author: Elena Popova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Russian Federation Submission date 10 May 2012 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2217/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2482/en-US
Eshonov v. Uzbekistan
Eshonov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/99/D/1225/2003 Communication number s : 1225/2003 Author: Olimzhon Eshonov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 08 Sep 2003 Date of decision 22 Jul 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1225/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1568/en-US
Fardon v. Australia
Fardon v. Australia CCPR/C/98/D/1629/2007 Communication number s : 1629/2007 Author: Robert John Fardon Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Australia Submission date 01 Mar 2006 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: An individual JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1629/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1574/en-US
G.A. v. Uzbekistan
G.A. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/124/D/2335/2014 Communication number s : 2335/2014 Author: G.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 124 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 12 Dec 2012 Date of decision 02 Nov 2018 Comment: Dissenting individual JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2335/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2555/en-US
Gonçalves et al. v. Portugal
Gon alves et al. v. Portugal CCPR/C/98/D/1565/2007 Communication number s : 1565/2007 Author: Aur lio Gon alves et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Portugal Submission date 31 Jan 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1565/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1563/en-US
I.D.G. v. Spain
I.D.G. v. Spain E/C.12/55/D/2/2014 Communication number s : 002/2014 Author: I.D.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Spain Submission date 28 Jan 2014 Date of decision 17 Jun 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBE/C.12/55/D/2/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2010/en-US
Ičić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
I i v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/113/D/2028/2011 Communication number s : 2028/2011 Author: Mevlida I i Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 10 Dec 2010 Date of decision 30 Mar 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2028/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1993/en-US
J.R.T. and the W.G. party v. Canada
J.R.T. and the W.G. party v. Canada CCPR/C/18/D/104/1981 Communication number s : 104/1981 Author: J.R.T. and the W.G. party names deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 18 Country Canada Submission date 18 Jul 1981 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/104/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/392/en-US
J.S. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
J.S. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/53/D/38/2012 Communication number s : 038/2012 Author: Mr. J.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 53 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/53/D/38/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1694/en-US
John Alfred Vogel v. New Zealand
John Alfred Vogel v. New Zealand CAT/C/62/D/672/2015 Communication number s : 672/2015 Author: John Alfred Vogel represented by counsel Tony Ellis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country New Zealand Submission date 05 Jan 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/672/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2404/en-US
Kudrna v. Czech Republic
Kudrna v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/96/D/1582/2007 Communication number s : 1582/2007 Author: Vera Kudrna Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Czech Republic Submission date 23 Dec 2006 Date of decision 21 Jul 2009 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1582/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1529/en-US
Kwami Mopongo and others v. Morocco
Kwami Mopongo and others v. Morocco CAT/C/53/D/321/2007 Communication number s : 321/2007 Author: Kwami Mopongo and others represented by counsel Mr. Alberto J. Revuelta Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Morocco Submission date 28 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/321/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2038/en-US
L.G.M. v. Spain
L.G.M. v. Spain CCPR/C/102/D/1617/2007 Communication number s : 1617/2007 Author: L.G.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 102 Country Spain Submission date 02 May 2006 Date of decision 26 Jul 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1617/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1634/en-US
Lindgren et al. v. Sweden
Lindgren et al. v. Sweden CCPR/C/40/D/298/1988 Communication number s : 298/1988 299/1988 Author: G. and L. Lindgren and L. Holm A. and B. Hjord I. Lundquist L. Radko and E. Stahl Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 40 Country Sweden JUTBCCPR/C/40/D/298/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/666/en-US
Lovelace v. Canada
Lovelace v. Canada CCPR/C/13/D/24/1977 Communication number s : 024/1977 Author: Sandra Lovelace Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 13 Country Canada Submission date 29 Dec 1977 Date of decision 30 Jul 1981 Comment: 1 Mr. Walter Tarnopolsky JUTBCCPR/C/13/D/24/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/286/en-US
M.A.M.N. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
M.A.M.N. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/76/D/141/2019 Communication number s : 141/2019 Author: M.A.M.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/141/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3035/en-US
M.B.B. v. Sweden
M.B.B. v. Sweden CAT/C/22/D/104/1998 Communication number s : 104/1998 Author: M.B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Dec 1997 Date of decision 05 May 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/22/D/104/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/249/en-US