Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1261 - 1280 of 1473
European Interim Agreement on Social Security other than Schemes for Old Age, Invalidity and Survivors (ETS No. 013)
European Interim Agreement on Social Security other than Schemes for Old Age Invalidity and Survivors ETS No. 013 013 Paris 1953 12 11T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Paris 1954 07 01T00:00:00 COEETS No. 013https://rm.coe.int/16800637bc
European Social Charter (ETS No. 035)
European Social Charter ETS No. 035 035 Turin 1961 10 18T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe Turin 1965 02 26T00:00:00 5 Ratifications. The European Social Charter of 1961 is the counterpart of the European COEETS No. 035https://rm.coe.int/168006b642
F.E.C. v. Spain
F.E.C. v. Spain CCPR/C/130/D/3810/2020 Communication number s : 3810/2020 Author: F.E.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Spain Submission date 19 Nov 2019 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3810/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3246/en-US
F.F.Z. v. Denmark
F.F.Z. v. Denmark CAT/C/28/D/180/2001 Communication number s : 180/2001 Author: F.F.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 28 Country Denmark Submission date 01 Mar 2001 Date of decision 30 Apr 2002 Comment: Pursuant to rule 103 paragraph 1 c JUTBCAT/C/28/D/180/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/192/en-US
F.O.F. v. Brazil
F.O.F. v. Brazil CRPD/C/23/D/40/2017 Communication number s : 40/2017 Author: F.O.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Brazil Submission date 21 Dec 2016 Date of decision 02 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/40/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3071/en-US
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT ICELAND
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT ICELAND ISL 2018 03 23 2018 04 12 Adoption: 23 March 2018 Publication: 12 April 2018 Public GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-4-Final-eng-Iceland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-4-Final-eng-Iceland-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of Members of Parliament, Judges and Prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SWITZERLAND
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of Members of Parliament Judges and Prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SWITZERLAND CHE 2016 12 02 2017 03 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGrecoEval-4Rep-2016-5-eng-final-EVAL4-Switzerland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval-4Rep-2016-5-eng-final-EVAL4-Switzerland-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT MONACO
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT MONACO MCO 2017 06 23 2017 07 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION III. GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2017-1-eng-Final-Monaco-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2017-1-eng-Final-Monaco-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA USA 2016 12 02 2017 01 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-10-en-Final-USA-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-10-en-Final-USA-PUBLIC
First Opinion on the United Kingdom
First Opinion on the United Kingdom GBR ACFC/INF/OP/I 2002 6 2001 11 30 2002 05 22 Strasbourg 22 May 2002 ACFC/INF/OP/I 2002 6 Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Opinion on the United Kingdom adopted FCNMACFC/INF/OP/I(2002)6https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_OP_UnitedKingdom_en
Fitth Round Evaluation Report on France
Fitth Round Evaluation Report on France FRA 2019 12 06 2020 01 09 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Publication: 9 January 2020 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2019 2 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-France-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-France-PUBLIC
Fourth Opinion on Bulgaria
Fourth Opinion on Bulgaria BGR ACFC/OP/IV 2020 001Final 2020 05 26 2020 10 12 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2020 001Final Fourth Opinion on Bulgaria adopted on 26 May 2020 Summary FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2020)001Finalhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Op_Bulgaria_EN
Fourth Opinion on Lithuania
Fourth Opinion on Lithuania LTU ACFC/OP/IV 2018 004 2018 05 30 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Restricted ACFC/OP/IV 2018 004 Fourth Opinion on Lithuania adopted on 30 May 2018 Summary Lithuanian FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2018)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Lithuania_en
Fraser and Fisher v. Jamaica
Fraser and Fisher v. Jamaica CCPR/C/65/D/722/1996 Communication number s : 722/1996 Author: Anthony Fraser and Nyron Fisher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Jamaica Submission date 07 Aug 1996 Date of decision 31 Mar 1999 JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/722/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/772/en-US
G.B.M. v. Sweden
G.B.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/435/2010 Communication number s : 435/2010 Author: G.B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 05 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/435/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/16/en-US
G.R. et al. v. Switzerland
G.R. et al. v. Switzerland CRC/C/87/D/86/2019 Communication number s : 086/2019 Author: D.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 May 2019 Date of decision 31 May 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/87/D/86/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2970/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) FRANCE
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention FRANCE FRA a111a a19 a22 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2019)16_France_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2019)16_France_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gridin v. Russian Federation
Gridin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/69/D/770/1997 Communication number s : 770/1997 Author: Dimitry L. Gridin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Russian Federation Submission date 27 Jun 1996 Date of decision 20 Jul 2000 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/770/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/378/en-US
Gunan v. Kyrgyzstan
Gunan v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/102/D/1545/2007 Communication number s : 1545/2007 Author: Ahmet Gunan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 29 Jan 2007 Date of decision 25 Jul 2011 Comment: The texts of three JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1545/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1597/en-US
Hagan v. Australia
Hagan v. Australia CERD/C/62/D/26/2002 Communication number s : 026/2002 Author: Stephen Hagan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Australia Submission date 31 Jul 2002 Date of decision 20 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/62/D/26/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1745/en-US