Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 841 - 860 of 998
Ortikov v. Uzbekistan
Ortikov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/118/D/2317/2013 Communication number s : 2317/2013 Author: Kayum Ortikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 14 Jul 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2317/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2145/en-US
P. S. N. v. Denmark
P. S. N. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/36/2006 Communication number s : 036/2006 Author: P. S. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Feb 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/36/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1733/en-US
Pérez Guartambel v. Ecuador
P rez Guartambel v. Ecuador CERD/C/100/D/61/2017 Communication number s : 61/2017 Author: Yaku P rez Guartambel Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 100 Country Ecuador Submission date 10 Feb 2017 Date of decision 04 Dec 2019 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/100/D/61/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3445/en-US
Pérez Guartambel v. Ecuador
P rez Guartambel v. Ecuador CERD/C/106/D/61/2017 Communication number s : 61/2017 Author: Yaku Sacha P rez Guartambel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Ecuador Submission date 10 Feb 2017 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/106/D/61/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3457/en-US
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand CAT/C/68/D/852/2017 Communication number s : 852/2017 Author: Paul Zentveld represented by counsel Victor Boyd from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights New Zealand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country JUTBCAT/C/68/D/852/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2697/en-US
Pinkney v. Canada
Pinkney v. Canada CCPR/C/14/D/27/1977 Communication number s : 027/1977 Author: Larry James Pinkney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 14 Country Canada Submission date 25 Nov 1977 Date of decision 29 Oct 1981 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/14/D/27/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/458/en-US
Pohl et al. v. Austria
Pohl et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1160/2003 Communication number s : 1160/2003 Author: Godfried and Ingrid Pohl Wolfgang Mayer Franz Wallmann Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 23 Sep 2002 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1160/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1114/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention (CETS No. 194) (*)
Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms amending the control system of the Convention CETS No. 194 194 Strasbourg 2004 05 13T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of COECETS No. 194https://rm.coe.int/1680083711
Protocol No. 2 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, conferring upon the European Court of Human Rights competence to give advisory opinions (ETS No. 044) (*)
Protocol No. 2 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms conferring upon the European Court of Human Rights competence to give advisory opinions ETS No. 044 044 Strasbourg 1963 05 06T00:00:00 Since its entry into force COEETS No. 044https://rm.coe.int/168006b65a
Protocol No. 3 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending Articles 29, 30 and 34 of the Convention (ETS No. 045) (*)
Protocol No. 3 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms amending Articles 29 30 and 34 of the Convention ETS No. 045 045 Strasbourg 1963 05 06T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part COEETS No. 045https://rm.coe.int/168006b65b
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (ETS No. 046)
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto ETS No. 046 046 Strasbourg 1963 09 COEETS No. 046https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c
Protocol No. 5 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending Articles 22 and 40 of the Convention (ETS No. 055) (*)
Protocol No. 5 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms amending Articles 22 and 40 of the Convention ETS No. 055 055 Strasbourg 1966 01 20T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of COEETS No. 055https://rm.coe.int/168006ff5d
Protsko et al v. Belarus
Protsko et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015 CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016 Communication number s : 2897/2016 2909/2016 2910/2016 2915/2016 2712/2015 Author: Aleksandr Protsko and Eduard Nelyubovich Yury Lyashenko Natalya Shchukina Vladimir Katsora And Type JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015, CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3646/en-US
Purna Maya v. Nepal
Purna Maya v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013 Communication number s : 2245/2013 Author: Purna Maya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2238/en-US
R.G. et al. v. Sweden
R.G. et al. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/586/2014 Communication number s : 586/2014 Author: R.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/56/D/586/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2068/en-US
R.G. v. Kyrgyzstan
R.G. v. Kyrgyzstan CEDAW/C/77/D/133/2018 Communication number s : 133/2018 Author: R.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 10 May 2018 Date of decision 03 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/77/D/133/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3130/en-US
R.K.B. v. Türkiye
R.K.B. v. T rkiye CEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010 Communication number s : 028/2010 Author: R.K.B. represented by counsel Ozge Yildiz Arslan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country T rkiye Submission date 14 Jul 2009 Date of decision 24 Feb 2012 JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1720/en-US
R.R.L. et al. v. Canada
R.R.L. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/61/D/659/2015 Communication number s : 659/2015 Author: R.R.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Canada Submission date 02 Feb 2015 Date of decision 10 Aug 2017 Comment: Decision of non violation. JUTBCAT/C/61/D/659/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2219/en-US
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON MINORITY ISSUES, GAY MCDOUGALL : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO FRANCE
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON MINORITY ISSUES GAY MCDOUGALL : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO FRANCE A/HRC/7/23/Add.2 NULL 2008 03 04T06:00:00 SR Minorities UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/7/23/Add.2 4 March 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN UHRIA/HRC/7/23/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6d4592b4-5dc3-427f-9d45-1983122f2d28