Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 1729
Amanklychev v. Turkmenistan
Amanklychev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/116/D/2078/2011 Communication number s : 2078/2011 Author: Annakurban Amanklychev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 27 May 2009 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2078/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2111/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BEL/CO/6 NULL 2019 12 06T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BEL/CO/6 International Covenant on Distr.: General 6 December 2019 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BEL/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/943606ba-aac7-4b1e-9f9b-ec5c020ce60b
BELVEDERE ALBERGHIERA SRL v. Italy
BELVEDERE ALBERGHIERA SRL v. Italy ITA 30/08/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Property rights: Resort to indirect expropriation a practice of emergency occupation of land by local administrative authorities pursuant to Law No. 85 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28192
BOLJEVIC v. Serbia
BOLJEVIC v. Serbia SRB 16/09/2020 00:00:00 29/09/2020 17:20:46 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the domestic courts refusal to reopen the time barred paternity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55953
Bakurov v. Russian Federation
Bakurov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/107/D/1861/2009 Communication number s : 1861/2009 Author: Sergei Bakurov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Russian Federation Submission date 22 Sep 2008 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1861/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1650/en-US
Benhadj v. Algeria
Benhadj v. Algeria CCPR/C/90/D/1173/2003 Communication number s : 1173/2003 Author: Abdelhamid Benhadj Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Algeria Submission date 31 Mar 2003 Date of decision 20 Jul 2007 Comment: Two Committee JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1173/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1363/en-US
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008 Communication number s : 1748/2008 Author: Josef Bergauer et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 100 Country Czech Republic Submission date 05 Oct 2007 Date of decision 28 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1553/en-US
Breleur v. France
Breleur v. France CERD/C/107/D/66/2018 Communication number s : 66/2018 Author: Stanislas Breleur Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country France Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 30 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/107/D/66/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3602/en-US
C.A. v. Italy
C.A. v. Italy CCPR/C/18/D/127/1982 Communication number s : 127/1982 Author: C.A. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 18 Country Italy Submission date 26 Jun 1982 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/127/1982https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/479/en-US
C.C.N. v. Sweden
C.C.N. v. Sweden CCPR/C/136/D/3701/2020 Communication number s : 3701/2020 Author: C.C.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Sweden Submission date 03 Jan 2020 Date of decision 24 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3701/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3680/en-US
C.E. v. Canada
C.E. v. Canada CCPR/C/2/D/13/1977 Communication number s : 013/1977 Author: C.E. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 2 Country Canada Submission date 20 Jun 1977 Date of decision 25 Aug 1977 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/2/D/13/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/403/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8000/08 THE AIRE CENTRE GBR 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion to Nigeria Sections 3 5 a and 5 of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 82 2 j and k and 84 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000800008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106282
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA 1439/06 BELINSKAYA M. RUS 10/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage award Article 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 350 90 193 448 220 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD000143906https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100964